Skip to main content

First, a big Thank You to Alan (@AlanRail) for 3D printing my test parts! They proved my many hours of research and calculations are paying off, and I'm one step closer to launching my dream! These parts will help me identify which details can be included on the short hood, and as a visual cue as I progress in the model design.

hood_brake

Here's an example of identifying details I can leave out. The brake lever and housing are prototypically correct (and look awesome in person.) The holes in the lever may never be seen due to the orientation of the lever in the brake recess of the hood. The bolt detail of the housing can only be seen by zooming in.

lever_housinghousing

Testing location of walkway light and sand doors. The part dimensions are correct, but more information has to be gathered before integrating them into the model.

hood_door

Here's a semi-detailed mockup of the locomotive with hoods and cab. I superimposed it over a specification drawing to see if I was in the ballpark. (The mockup has an 81" short hood the late model GP40-2 drawing has an 87" short hood.) I would say it's a pretty good match!

gp40-2 rr

gp40-2 ls-vs87

As happy as I am with the progress so far, I have to face some realities. The derailments as I call them.  I'm a one-man shop. I have a full-time job and a new marriage to work around. As fast as I want to get this and other model train related items to the market, there may come a time or two when I will have to back burner the projects.

Another reality to face is the various sub-genres of O Scale and the conflicts they create. I have ideas on how to mitigate some of the minor conflicts. One major issue to deal with is 3R command. Do I choose to go with one proprietary system over another (potentially leaving a portion of modelers out) or leave it to the modeler to purchase aftermarket parts? If I leave it to the 3R modeler to choose, how high will the cost be, will there be enough stock available, and are they willing to wire the locomotives themselves? Or do I go nuclear, design a system, and then WAY undercut the other's prices, so my system gets a foothold?

Made in the U.S. - that's what I'd like to see on the boxes that ship out. Having received quotes for other model train items, that could be a derailment. It would be nice to have the items produced as close to home as possible. I could possibly have it done by creating kits that the end user puts together and paints (which would also negate obtaining licenses for paint schemes.)

Feel free to leave comments below. I'll update as I reach new milestones on this project. The other projects, well, you'll have to wait for the first catalogue...

Attachments

Images (6)
  • hood_brake
  • lever_housing
  • housing
  • hood_door
  • gp40-2 ls-vs87
  • gp40-2 rr
Last edited by ChessieFan72
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

If the GP40-2 follows the same lineage as the SD40-2, the short hood length changed from 81" to 87" with the specification change in 1977.  Units produced before this time had the shorter short hood and units produced after had the slightly longer short hood.  Don't know if that helps you, but it was an interesting bit of information I learned from researching SD40-2s. 

Best of luck in your endeavor!  Progress is looking good.

@Darrell posted:

As far as electronics go, I would use a bridge rectifier with a filter cap and just install a Blunami. That way you get command control and sounds with a one board install and anybody can run it using the ios or android app since it's bluetooth.

Blunami came out just recently. That's why it's not discussed in the OP. But you're right, it's a good option to look at!

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×