Skip to main content

The thread detailing possible RF interference with DCS signal caused my to dig with Google's help for more of that story.  I have plenty of the common glitches with Engine Not Found, Out of RF Range, Engine Not on Track, etc.  Here is an unexpected new issue that could be important to some of us. My basement full of aging 4 foot fluorescent tubes and ballasts may be an example.  There are plenty of other possibilities given the size and trackwork complexity of my layout, but this may be one to eliminate using (non-dimmered) T8 LED replacement tubes of the type that can be wired without using the ballast to run directly on the 110v supply, eliminating all of the possible RF that came from tubes or ballasts.  I assume that means these T8's have LEDs in series in the right number to use 110v fully without any help.

It's not clear that KT8K is talking about older fluorescent tube fixtures, but it seems likely he's including them.  If others have knowledge or experience, please add it here.

From: http://www.eham.net/articles/16365

RE: RF Pollution by 'Compact Florescent' Light Bulbs 
by KT8K on April 20, 2007
"I could be mis-remembering, but I have found noisy flourescent lights to often be failing. Either the ballast is starting to short out, or something else is going wrong, but electrical noise often seemed associated with impending failure of the light. So it might not be just the cheap units, but also the lights that are telling you of their imminent demise."

Don

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Fluorescent lighting ballasts are operating @ 20KHz, the MTH DCS is operating @ 900 MHz. Your cordless phone could step on the DCS signal, but I would doubt that the lighting would. Maybe something on the 115 VAC side could be causing your TIU to go whack-a-doodle; assuming the TIU and "failing" lights are on the same circuit.

Last edited by Gilly@N&W

I have a basement full of older T12 4' twin tube fluorescent fixtures. 10 of the fixtures are either above or very near to the layout. I have changed the ballast in some of them as they have failed. I have no problems with DCS signals. I haven't had a DCS error in the over two years that the current layout has been in place. The errors I got before that were due to the layout not being properly blocked which has now been corrected.

Thanks for all the replies so far.  By coincidence, a friend who is an EE (electrical engineer), retired from rocketry service, responded to my question by saying failing fluorescents can emit a wide range of RF frequencies, so his advice was simple: get rid of them and try LED replacement tubes that use the same fixture, rewired eliminating the ballast ("Toggled" is the brand I have used before, and will try here.)  FYI the same day I posted, with all fluorescents off, I left a PS2 locomotive live on track for about 5 hours without a hiccup; remote still controlled it without re selecting the engine first.  Not long after turning on the lights had a mystery stop while running down the track.

Will try rewiring a dozen fixtures on one circuit, and running with only those for lights for a good while to see if it cleans up the problem.  Few fixtures, not extremely close to track, might well not do this ( have 17 4 ft 2-tube fixtures in the large train room area); or fixtures maintained better than mine which have old tubes and ballasts and may be emitting a variety of "not normal" RF frequencies.  I have an open mind, and need to try it since there are so many potential confounding variables.  Will add more when the experiment is further along!

Add Reply

Post
The DCS Forum is sponsored by
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×