Skip to main content

3A307EF3-6256-4E1D-BB40-747B8D1DD6F0739C8658-A2F6-4119-B3DB-F9F117DD14EDPictured is a Max Gray 4-8-0.  As you can see the cab contains an open frame motor.  The locomotive has a nonidler gearbox.  I plan to remove the motor and place a can motor in the tender. The drive connection would be a mixture of 4mm rod and Toyota vacuum hose.  The length of the drive shaft would be about 6-7”.   I surmise it may be better to divide the shaft into two parts with hose joints mid shaft, at the motor and at the gearbox.

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 3A307EF3-6256-4E1D-BB40-747B8D1DD6F0
  • 739C8658-A2F6-4119-B3DB-F9F117DD14ED
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

My solution - a solid drive shaft supported under the cab with a bearing, terminated over the drawbar with a cup portion of a large horney ball.

The tender has the motor mounted low enough to align - the motor has a Touyota hose terminated with the matching horney ball.

The tender also has the front truck stabilized laterally - just like the SP did on those small Vanderbilt tenders.

@Ed Kelly posted:

A thought:  Use a Pittman 8000 series motor facing backwards toward the cab with a Sunset type belt drive.

Just brainstorming.

Ed

That is an interesting idea.  If this thing had an idler gearbox like many KTM engines, I think that your idea will definitely work.  Not sure with current acute angle of the drive shaft into the nonidler gearbox.

@bob2 posted:

These things rarely pulled more than four cars at the end of steam.  I left mine as-is.

look for short circuits between tender trucks and things like rerail frogs.

Good point. Seeing a big motor in the cab just bothers me a bit. But I guess that is compromise.  These open frame motors seem sort of flimsy as well.  Maybe I can shoehorn a Pittman 8x32, if I can find one.  Found a short fat 9432 motor the other day.  It’s about 1/2” shorter than a 9433 and will likely fit.  We’ll see.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×