TMCC gurus I need the benefit of your experience!!
I've been hard at work designing a layout. One of the features I'm considering is a hidden staging yard one level below the platform surface. As fate would have it, it turns out that the best location for the hidden staging yard is directly below the main operational yard. The vertical separation will only be 6 1/2" to 7" between railheads (to minimize the grade climbing out of staging.)
I've heard horror stories about poor signal reception with closely-spaced yard tracks, burying ground wires in the ballast, etc. I've also heard that sometimes one track passing over another causes TMCC carrier signal issues. So this could be a worst-case scenario.
To aid in your understanding, here's a SCARM 3D representation of the "stacked" yards...
-All of the track on both levels is in parallel alignment
-Spacing between adjacent yard tracks is at least 4" (I left plenty of "finger room.")
-Vertical spacing between the levels will be 6 1/2" to 7" (don't want to go deeper; trying to keep the grade shallow as possible)
-It might be necessary to support the upper level with aluminum angle in this area, running perpendicular to the track. (angle joists are not shown in the 3D rendering, and I'm not even sure if this would affect the signal, but FYI.)
So... am I setting myself up for frustration with this track configuration? I do own one of Dale / GRJ's boosters so that option is available. So are some radical options that might be perceived as heresy in this section of the Forum! Please share your thoughts!!