Originally Posted by PennsyPride94:
Mr. Melvin,
I greatly appreciate your efforts to keep this forum running especially since it is an excellent free resource to O gauge railroading.
If I could give any suggestion it would be to moderate this forum across all members equally. I, as others have mentioned already, have noticed there are a few members on this forum who offer lots of expertise, but often respond to amateur questions regarding their field of expertise with hostility.
Secondly, these experts often with their answers provoke inappropriate responses out of the original questioner and other forum members who try to chime in with their knowledge about the topic. Typically from what I have read I have noticed that this then causes the thread to go out of control due to the member with expertise demeaning the person whose facts are wrong or misinterpreted. Upon that I have additionally noticed that when moderating this forum, you as the moderator have chastised the person who writes an inappropriate response to the expert (which is right on your part), but have never mentioned to the expert (publicly) that they should also watch their tone and attitude towards others who are looking to learn.
Granted, if someone states something grossly incorrect about the field of expertise of the expert member they have every right to correct them. The difference comes down to whether or not they do it civilly. Many people on this forum read extensively, as do I, and think they know facts about something, but maybe are mistaken. Typical normal human beings (which most forum members here are) can admit they are wrong if told politely they are, but a typical normal human being at the same time will not easily admit their wrong if their intellectual capacity is questioned due to their wrong statement.
For example Mr. Melvin it would be like you stating that our heart is on the right side of our body and I reply stating "Where did you get THAT information? Have you ever studied human anatomy? You should do your research before you say something like THAT!"
My statement neither corrects you or promotes the discussion to further the conversation. Which is the point of the threads here. All it serves to do is provoke an inappropriate response out of someone who does not like being spoken to that way. (Which are most human beings who have feelings anyways.)
All I am saying to you in regards to all of this is that if you are looking to make this forum more welcoming and promoting towards the hobby, it would be a great first step to rule with a heavy hand across all members regardless of their level of expertise about anything. By doing so you treat person A the same as person B regarding what they state.
I hope this helps to improve this forum overall and help to constructively build this forum into becoming an even better resource than what it already is.
Thanks for everything!
Others have said things to the same effect, this is just the most recent, so gets the quote today.
While I don't particularly disagree with the ownership of the forums running them however they like, and however they think is the best method, here are my thoughts, as requested.
1. folks should be moderated equally, no favoritism just because someone may have some sort of standing in the o gauge community, a wealth of knowledge, or insider connections.
2. A. I don't think this forum could exist without mention of products, and simply giving complements is fairly useless. Yes, the TOS state that critiquing products is not allowed, but is seems that it is only half-heartly enforced. It seems that honest experiences with particular products have never been a problem for the administration of the site, but only broad negative comments of companies as a whole. I feel the TOS should be changed to reflect this apparent stance. Perhaps allowing for product reviews with full disclosure of merits AND FLAWS of products.
2. B. Several posts in this thread directly and indirectly state that advertisers will be given special treatment, and that forum members will not be allowed to speak poorly of these income generators. This is good business on one hand, as you keep the advertisers happy and paying the bills. On the other hand, it means that any product review in any copy of OGR magazine must now be thrown in the trash as it can not be expected to be an honest, and un-biased product review, but rather a nice long advertisement for whatever product it is.
3. The administration is free to moderate in any way they choose. Some things are good in running a tight ship, others bad. Allowing a few "experts" to run roughshod over others is likely to drive folks away that make have plenty of their own expertise to offer, but choose not to wield it like a scepter over others.
4. Folks may want to look into a better forum hosting software if the current one does not have an enough of a feature set to provide advanced functions. This ties into #5.
5. The information may or may not be available to the public as to how many digital subscribers there are. I made a rough guess based on there being 32 in the first 500 names of members. This provided me with an estimate that 6.4% of forum members are digital subscribers. The number was closer to 20% of the folks that actually participate on the forum regularly, but I digress. 6.4% of the 17,176 forum members as of this writing is just about 1100 estimated digital subscribers, or about $2,750 a month of income for OGR. Based on Rich's comment of the servers costing "Several Thousand Dollars a month to operate and maintain this forum", it seems to me the users are already footing the bill. I can picture the real costs being a bit higher due to bandwidth, but then again, while 8 million views a month is a lot... the data is almost entirely text.
Long story short the digital subscribers are already paying at least half, if not all the cost to host this forum. Perhaps they should be given equal standing to the advertisers that provide the other (maybe) half of the funding.
"There are two sides to every issue: one side is right and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil." - Ayn Rand