Skip to main content

I run a variety of tinplate, postwar,etc. I am going to make a future purpose with the goal in mind that satisfies a preference for long consists. Of course this leads to other's experiences with various engines. If you were in my shoes, what engine would you recommend? Steam diesel or electric will do as I am not particular as to type.

This could be postwar up to the present to narrow the field. Any suggestions will be appreciated and thanks in advance for any response. 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

As a generalization, the dual motored diesels typically will pull better than steamers.  Even dual-motored steamers don't seem to have the pulling power of a decent diesel.  I've pulled 53 cars with a single dual motor diesel, including a small grade.  No way I get any of my steamers to match that.

 

This is based on my observations only, so take it for what it's worth.  When I want to pull a long consist, I normally hook up one or more diesels.

My dual-motor Magne-traction postwar 2343  F3 set will pull the longest trains I can put together, 30+ mostly postwar cars (not the freest-rolling) on mostly flat track with O54 and O72 curves. Trains longer than that start having pull-apart problems unless you fine-tune all of your rolling stock. So it's not just a question of pulling power, but also track-train dynamics.

 

2012-3407x-floor-layout

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 2012-3407x-floor-layout

The Lionel Veranda Turbine is supposed to be one of the all time champs in this regard - two motors, diecastmetal body for weight.  I recall at the time OGR or CTT tested it way back and measured its pull, they had never seen a loco with more.  Mine will pull 31 passenger cars (24 aluminum and 7 plastic body) with no problem at all.   I think it would pull more but I am reluctant to push my luck with its original (now old) traction tires.

I ran an MTH scale Y6b with 100 loaded hoppers on O-72 track.  The diesels with plastic bodies will not pull as much as a large die-cast steamer. My Great Northern W-2 electric-(over 2 feet long with a die cast body) also pulled this, but not quite as easily.  The MTH Q-2 and Big Boy also pulled this train.  NO plastic diesel including the MTH DDA40X could do so.

If I had one or could affordd one I would hope the new $2200 engines from LIONEL would be the b est pullers,,,,,but you will need a lot of room and wide-wide curves,and I would weigh the cars and put them on behind the engines in order of weight.

 

In post  war lingo, I never found anything that could outpull the FM Trainmasters, and the GG-1's were no slouches either..

 

 

I've pulled 53 cars with a single dual motor diesel, including a small grade.  No way I get any of my steamers to match that.

 

 

 My steam have no trouble with 55 cars on level 072 and 082 Realtrax. This includes Lionel scale Big Boy, H-7 (2-8-8-2) and AC-9 (2-8-8-4) as well as my traditional size 4-6-2 and Mikado jr. many of those were heavy cars such as the TMCC Crane, K Line Evans auto loaders with die cast autos and die cast tank cars. Even the little Lionel 0-6-0T Docksider managed 41 cars, without slipping or getting hot after more than 5 minutes in charge of that train, I might try more this year, I put up 2 loops of 072 and 082 Realtrax around our Family and dining rooms, gives me about a 13x24 space.

 

Doug

MTH UP #80 coal Turbine should be a strong contender, although maybe not as potent as the Lionel Veranda.  Too bad Lionel never set up that Veranda as a four motored locomotive, as that combination certainly would have pulled the paint off the walls. For a single unit, I'd be inclined to consider the old Custom Trains (pre-MTH) FM, with the two BIG Mabuchi non flywheel cans. Not the smoothest runners, but monsterous for tractive effort!.

Pulling power depends on many factors, weight on the drivers, length of driver wheel base, and is the weight well distributed on the drivers (factor of adhesion) and not on the leading or trailing trucks, gear ratio (the higher the ratio, the more pulling power), and the size and torgue of your motor.  It is better if traction tires and magne-traction is not needed.  Also a larger radius track is helpful.  On the articulated steam engines, the usual drive system works well for the rear drivers, since most of the weight is concentrated there, while the front drivers have very little weight, besides what is in the frames, on them.  The better pulling engines have two motors independently attached to each set of drivers and the weight can be used on both front and rear drivers.  The Koh's articulateds, as well as those drive systems built by Stu Kleinschmidt, Sofua et al. fall in this catagory.  Because of the relatively long wheelbase of diesels, even Geeps, a GP-9 can outpull a Big Boy, if the diesel has alot of weight on it's drivers giving it a high factor of adhesion, and the Big Boy has a standard drive system (where most of the weight is on the rear drivers).  Because of their long rigid wheelbase, 2-10-4's and duplexes can take off with a long train when they are well weighted and have a good can motor.  The best combination is one of the old Lobaughs (articulateds) with a Kleinschmidt/Sofua 2-motored drive.  This is an unbeatable combination. Also, the old doorstops-Parmalee-Sturgis electrics, Alexander diesels and electrics are a good bet.

 

The early scale Mikados from Lionel, both the Southern and Frisco versions, were excellent pullers, mostly thanks to their robust Pittman motor and 4 traction tires. My Southern model from 1992, a terrific looker at that, has pulled 54 freight cars at once with minimal if any struggle. It kinda pushes the Amperage limit even on the MTH Z-4000! This engine outpulls even my newest Legacy locomotives. Not bad for a scale steamer that predates the newer wireless control and more sophisticated sound systems.

Last edited by Mikado 4501
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×