Skip to main content

TM Terry posted:

I was excited about the upcoming L&N FA-2 offering by 3rd Rail. Ordered one, then they announced the L&N FA-2 would be L&N's 1960's paint scheme. So much for a transition era L&N FA-2 offering.

That project is well into next year at this point.  Nothing has been set in stone for the FA-2 project.  I would think it is likely we will do the early scheme for L&N.  Scott takes his best guess with photos or other artwork to start.  Send him an email on your interest as others would likely prefer the same scheme. 

Right now 3rd Rail is knee deep in finishing E5 & E6s while also getting heavily into the F3 project.  Geeps will be next.  FA's likely after that if orders come through.

So GG1 4877 posted:
TM Terry posted:

I was excited about the upcoming L&N FA-2 offering by 3rd Rail. Ordered one, then they announced the L&N FA-2 would be L&N's 1960's paint scheme. So much for a transition era L&N FA-2 offering.

That project is well into next year at this point.  Nothing has been set in stone for the FA-2 project.  I would think it is likely we will do the early scheme for L&N.  Scott takes his best guess with photos or other artwork to start.  Send him an email on your interest as others would likely prefer the same scheme. 

Right now 3rd Rail is knee deep in finishing E5 & E6s while also getting heavily into the F3 project.  Geeps will be next.  FA's likely after that if orders come through.

So the GP7 and GP9 will be produced before Alco FA’s?

GG1 4877 posted:
TM Terry posted:

I was excited about the upcoming L&N FA-2 offering by 3rd Rail. Ordered one, then they announced the L&N FA-2 would be L&N's 1960's paint scheme. So much for a transition era L&N FA-2 offering.

That project is well into next year at this point.  Nothing has been set in stone for the FA-2 project.  I would think it is likely we will do the early scheme for L&N.  Scott takes his best guess with photos or other artwork to start.  Send him an email on your interest as others would likely prefer the same scheme. 

I had ordered the L&N FA-2 when the initial announcement was made. The drawing on their website showed the transition era colors. A couple months later the drawing was replaced with a photo of the 1960’s paint scheme. I called and canceled my order.

I will get back on board when I feel assured that the transition era paint scheme is one of the L&N FA-2’s being offered.

GG1 4877 posted:

Ron,

Yes, the PRR F3 will be phase II.  We will be reviewing the first round of factory drawings this weekend at Scott's office just after he gets back from his latest trip to China.  There is a lot to review!  I have my order in for an AB in PRR myself.

I have some F3’s in order when will we see delivery,thanks

MR-150 posted:

I have some F3’s in order when will we see delivery,thanks

Scott will know more than I would.  E6s are in progress so I'm just guessing that the end of the year is a reasonable time frame. 

jonnyspeed posted:

GGD passenger cars: Erie Stillwell coaches

Hmmm.... I just bought a book that has the plans for those along with all the mid Atlantic RR suburban coaches except for the CNJ standard coach which was the one I was looking for!   

I would guess a hard sell to get the numbers for such a unique car in anything but brass, but who knows?

GG1 4877 posted:
MR-150 posted:

I have some F3’s in order when will we see delivery,thanks

Scott will know more than I would.  E6s are in progress so I'm just guessing that the end of the year is a reasonable time frame. 

jonnyspeed posted:

GGD passenger cars: Erie Stillwell coaches

Hmmm.... I just bought a book that has the plans for those along with all the mid Atlantic RR suburban coaches except for the CNJ standard coach which was the one I was looking for!   

I would guess a hard sell to get the numbers for such a unique car in anything but brass, but who knows?

Scott liked the Stillwell idea AND I posted a poll on the 2 rail Facebook group and after just 2 days 11 people would purchase 1-9 cars and 2 would purchase 10+.

Agree!  E1 and E1b..... and later E2....  Would be nice to be possible for having an example of each in the line of E series motive power.

As for the Frisco and connecting line, the QA&P:   Many lines ran the same engines in that period of the early 20th century.  To have some available in a choice of lines, such as....   4-4-0 Americans in correct detail and paint for the QA&P...……. 4-6-0  in correct for QA&P/Frisco/T&P        2-10-0  Decapods for the same lines as mentioned.    In fact, to have a choice of popular and often used engines on Short Line Rails, and anyone produce passenger/freight cars also correct for such, even undecorated so they can be detailed specific to any Short Line.

I know, it can be a tall order for any company.  But, to allow modelers to have representation of the many Short Lines in our country.  Many of the large, and too often modeled, major railroads were at times dependent upon the Short Lines.

Jesse   TCA   12-68275

CSX Troy posted:

I would still LOVE to see Scott make an accurate N&W hopper - either HL / H9 2 bays or H2 / H2a 3 bay in plastic to go along with the Y6's from a few years ago:  

        N&W H9 HopperN&W H2a

You can find the mondo-heavy Atlas HL/H9 cars, likely on ebay, or elsewhere. The 3-bay cars are only available in brass, from (my experience) Precision and KTM. If you're really lucky you may find one of these painted and decaled...why, you ask? Because only Champ made decals for them (H2a).
If someone had produced the cars in plastique I would have bought several..I'm filled up, after years of looking & bidding.

rex desilets posted:
CSX Troy posted:

I would still LOVE to see Scott make an accurate N&W hopper - either HL / H9 2 bays or H2 / H2a 3 bay in plastic to go along with the Y6's from a few years ago:  

        N&W H9 HopperN&W H2a

You can find the mondo-heavy Atlas HL/H9 cars, likely on ebay, or elsewhere. The 3-bay cars are only available in brass, from (my experience) Precision and KTM. If you're really lucky you may find one of these painted and decaled...why, you ask? Because only Champ made decals for them (H2a).
If someone had produced the cars in plastique I would have bought several..I'm filled up, after years of looking & bidding.

And the H2 were leased to the PRR as well. I am surprised that Atlas O and/ or Weaver models and/ or MTH didn't make an accurate H2.

Instead of making a  locomotive that was built for only one railroad, I would like to see manufacturers build a compliment of USRA locos that all the rail lines owned.  Maybe a stock 0-6-0, 0-8-0, 2-8-0, 2-10-0, OR 2-8-2. It would nice to have these also done in undecorated so we can decal them for our own favorite line. Then a larger number of us can have these on our layouts in the road we model instead of having to deal with unwanted road names. The HO people have been doing this for years that's why HO is so big. You can model your favorite road and get a locomotive livery without having to settle.

Allan E posted:

Jonathan;

Speaking of being knee deep (btw my favorite brewery) in E6s, is there any chance they will be ready for delivery at O Scale West?

Allan

Allan,

When I last spoke to Scott just before he left for York, he told me that it looks like the E5/6 run will leave the factory in May.  Give it a month on the water along with customs and it sounds like a June delivery for these.  Wish I could make O Scale West!  Not in the cards this year. 

I've enjoyed a few Knee Deep brews myself!

GG1 4877 posted:
Allan E posted:

Jonathan;

Speaking of being knee deep (btw my favorite brewery) in E6s, is there any chance they will be ready for delivery at O Scale West?

Allan

Allan,

When I last spoke to Scott just before he left for York, he told me that it looks like the E5/6 run will leave the factory in May.  Give it a month on the water along with customs and it sounds like a June delivery for these.  Wish I could make O Scale West!  Not in the cards this year. 

I've enjoyed a few Knee Deep brews myself!

Jonathan;

Cheers!

Allan

third rail posted:

Instead of making a  locomotive that was built for only one railroad, I would like to see manufacturers build a compliment of USRA locos that all the rail lines owned.  Maybe a stock 0-6-0, 0-8-0, 2-8-0, 2-10-0, OR 2-8-2. It would nice to have these also done in undecorated so we can decal them for our own favorite line. Then a larger number of us can have these on our layouts in the road we model instead of having to deal with unwanted road names. The HO people have been doing this for years that's why HO is so big. You can model your favorite road and get a locomotive livery without having to settle.

I made a similar suggestion melgar_comment  earlier in this thread but no one has expressed agreement. It seems to me that everyone wants their favorite locomotive to be selected but, unless it's from a major railroad, it doesn't generate enough support. There were 12 USRA locomotive designs ranging from switchers to articulateds, to which 1856 locomotives were built while USRA was in existence and 3251 copies were made afterwards. USRA and USRA-derived designs ran on 97 railroads. It should be possible to build basic tooling to produce brass or die cast models with accurate prototypical details for many actual locomotives. This approach would also be more likely to generate sufficient orders for cost-effective production. And, for me, models of smaller locomotives would be just as welcome as larger ones.

MELGAR

Last edited by MELGAR

At my club EVERYONE has a 4-8-4 because all the manufacturers made tons of them, but no one has or runs switch engines. It's one thing to run a long train with a big engine at the point. But it's just as satisfying to break up that train and make a new one for the next run. IMO switching a yard or industrial sidings can be more fun than watching a train chase its caboose . If manufacturers could bring to market a reasonably priced switch engine and continue to produce it over the years, there would be enough interest amongst us hobbyists that they would not have to resort to "built to order" sales. I would rather buy 4 switchers for the price of one $2000 built to order road engine that I have no use for. What I'm  saying is I think built to order stifles the hobby because if not enough preorders are received the company does not manufacture the product. 

third rail posted:

At my club EVERYONE has a 4-8-4 because all the manufacturers made tons of them, but no one has or runs switch engines. It's one thing to run a long train with a big engine at the point. But it's just as satisfying to break up that train and make a new one for the next run. IMO switching a yard or industrial sidings can be more fun than watching a train chase its caboose . If manufacturers could bring to market a reasonably priced switch engine and continue to produce it over the years, there would be enough interest amongst us hobbyists that they would not have to resort to "built to order" sales. I would rather buy 4 switchers for the price of one $2000 built to order road engine that I have no use for. What I'm  saying is I think built to order stifles the hobby because if not enough preorders are received the company does not manufacture the product. 

I would say that the odds of 3rd Rail making a $500 switch engine, multiple times, is probably close to Nil.  LOL, I think I have better odds (maybe not by much! ) of seeing a Reading K-1 or even a Reading I-10 2-8-0 made.

Maybe at $700 - $800, Lionel or MTH could make a decent die-cast switch engine. I don't see this happening in brass.

Jim

A very large number of steam engine model types has already been produced in die cast and brass. Many of the less common types suggested here do not seem to get enough of a response to be cost-effective for production. Maybe the question to ask is - is production of the types of engines proposed in this thread feasible at anything like current pricing or has it just become too expensive even for the small number of relatively affluent buyers who are active in the high-end O scale/gauge market?

For many years, I would have liked to buy a New Haven I-5 4-8-4, although I already own the nice model that was made by Weaver. But, at likely current prices, I would not buy.

Just my thoughts...

MELGAR

Last edited by MELGAR

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×