Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Pingman:

       

Josh, you are off to a good start. 

 

Suggestion only:  In the Harley Davidson world there are riders and posers.  Posers use words and phrases that a rider would not use.  For example, a poser will describe his one bike crash as "laying it down."  Everyone within ear shot knows instantly the guy crashed his bike.  A rider will freely admit he screwed up and crashed his bike when he should not have.

 

So too in model railroading.  Using the term "lash up" is associated with the poser.  You can be whatever you want to be in this hobby; but, "lash up" is a phrase I will always associate with a poser.

 

Best of luck with your layout.


       

I used the word lashup because that's what it's called on the legacy system, a lash up.
Originally Posted by Josh Rudnick:

       

I used the word lashup because that's what it's called on the legacy system, a lash up.

Rich/Webmaster has pretty much given up trying to rid the OGR forum of the term 'lash-up'. As he has explained someone at Lionel misusing the term for any train, scale or real, does not make it 'correct'. And since Rich is a veteran REAL railroader....I side with him!!

 

But hey......good news is you are running trains!!!!! And I hope having fun!

Originally Posted by AMCDave:

       
Originally Posted by Josh Rudnick:

      

I used the word lashup because that's what it's called on the legacy system, a lash up.
Rich/Webmaster has pretty much given up trying to rid the OGR forum of the term 'lash-up'. As he has explained someone at Lionel misusing the term for any train, scale or real, does not make it 'correct'. And since Rich is a veteran REAL railroader....I side with him!!

But hey......good news is you are running trains!!!!! And I hope having fun!

       

I'm pretty new around here so I didn't know. What terminology would be better suited?
Last edited by Josh Rudnick
Josh is correct.  Lash Up is a term used by the manufacturers.  Just because the webmaster, rightfully so hates it because of the real world of trains, doesn't mean that it's improper when referring to the model trains and toy trains we play with and operate.  Use lash up and everyone here knows what you are talking about because it's in every manual published by Lionel and MTH.
 
While it never hurts to learn the proper terminology, it doesn't make you a poser if you use lash up.  Saying that is a bit arrogant.
 
Color me a poser.
 
Originally Posted by Pingman:

Josh, you are off to a good start. 

 

Suggestion only:  In the Harley Davidson world there are riders and posers.  Posers use words and phrases that a rider would not use.  For example, a poser will describe his one bike crash as "laying it down."  Everyone within ear shot knows instantly the guy crashed his bike.  A rider will freely admit he screwed up and crashed his bike when he should not have.

 

So too in model railroading.  Using the term "lash up" is associated with the poser.  You can be whatever you want to be in this hobby; but, "lash up" is a phrase I will always associate with a poser.

 

Best of luck with your layout.

 

Last edited by MartyE

Great layout!   Great locos, thanks for the video.

 

MU: for real diesels and OK for model diesels

Double-headed, tripple-headed for real steam and model steam

Lash-up: OK for model diesels.   Perhaps acceptable for model steam as well?

 

I think we have been through this before a couple of times 

Good grief, Pingman. I see you decided to get on your high horse today, be careful up there. 

 

Josh, There is nothing wrong with the term lashup.  Although not common, the term is used to describe multiple locomotives - even outside O-gauge. I wish you wouldn't have felt the need to change your post title, it really wasn't necessary. 

 

~~ A proud O-gauge "poser" for almost 15 years! ~~

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×