...
Me thinks someone might consider trimming those trees though.
...
As expected, I don't think anyone paying the $20 fee to be trackside "upstairs" was gonna capture a cover photo. Just too many folks in the way -- not to mention the angle up their is not conducive to giving a "birds eye" view of the curve, not to mention the overgrowth of trees and shrubs. Nonetheless, I would have gladly paid $20 to be trackside, 'cause the value was in EXPERIENCING 765 first-hand up close on the curve -- not necessarily photographing it, if you know what I mean. Sometimes there's an innate, simple value just "enjoying the moment".
The most memorable photos of Horseshoe Curve have ALWAYS been from a vantage point that is often not available to the casual visitor. (Isn't that often the case with most venues?) I don't know the in's and out's of Horseshoe Curve territory all that well, but I would think you'd need to be high in the hills to capture the best photos of trains on the curve. And I'm not sure how much of that land up in the hills is public vs. NS private property (or other private property for that matter).
The NS photo captured from the signal bridge is an excellent viewpoint showing 765 and its consist within a generous portion of the curve -- nicely composed image, without needing to hike up into the hills... but needing OBVIOUS permission with appropriate inside connections to NS. I just wonder if a few more images will surface that might have been captured high in the hills on the East slope. But again, I don't know what kind of access/permission is required to reach those areas.
I'm somewhat more familiar with territory a bit west of the curve, where there are some terrific vantage points that I'm sure will be very popular for the return trip on Monday! And access to those is relatively straightforward... and safe.
David