Skip to main content

I've only been back in the hobby for about a year after almost a 50 year hiatus, but thought I'd share the following story.

About two weeks ago, my daughter and son-in-law went to an estate sale and saw a box in the corner and opened it up. There was a very large steam engine and tender and an old Lionel red caboose inside. They were in pretty rough condition and they didn't know much about them except the engine weighed a lot and had a "run-program" switch on the bottom. The guy said they probably hadn't been run in over 10 years. They asked how much and the guy said $25 - my son-in-law countered with $15 and they settled on $20 for all three and that was my Hanukkah present this past Saturday.
 
Turns out it was the K-Line Union Pacific 4-8-8-4 TMCC "Big Boy" steam engine and tender. I took it home and all 4 traction tires were dry-rotted and falling off, so I took them off and will pick up some replacements. The wheels on the front 8-wheel drive truck were frozen, so I removed the rods and moved everything around and it freed up. I then cleaned, polished and lubricated everything and was able to program it into my Legacy system as a TMCC steam engine and it runs very well.
 
The crew talk sound is somewhat garbled (some messages are clear, while others are completely unintelligible)  and the spring on the front guide truck is soft and wants to de-rail on my O-36 curves. My understanding is that was a known issue with these trains. I believe the red 6017 caboose was made between 1952-1961.
 
All in all, not a bad $20 investment. A few pic's attached. Sorry in advance for the poor picture quality.
 
1. What would cause some of the crew talk to be clear and others garbled ?
 
2. Is there a "fix" for the front guide truck derailing issue ? It looks like maybe a stiffer spring would help.
 
Thanks.

Attachments

Images (3)
  • BIG BOY-1
  • BIG BOY-2
  • BIG BOY-3
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Early RailSounds versions, the type found factory installed by companies other than Lionel, were without features such as intelligible crew talk, etc.  Even earlier RailSounds had no crew talk/ tower com at all.  Lionel's practice is to release backdated TMCC versions to licensed manufacturers like K-Line, 3rd Rail, etc.  They don't license the latest CC versions to the competition, or to the public via ERR.  It wouldn't make good business sense.

I had a copy of K-Line's Big Boy and it seemed to perform really well, although I never tested it on the tight curves it was claimed to negotiate.  K-Line chose to scale down its dimensions so that the loco is pretty much S scale, with O gauge tread.  I think this was in answer to selective compression, so beautifully mastered by MTH RailKing and Lionel LionMaster.  I sold the engine to someone who wanted big steam that could negotiate 031.

Bruce

Thanks, John - I guess you never know what you'll find.

Maybe, Rick, they should have shared with the tower crew.

Bruce - you're right about the size - it's like a 1/64th scale version on O gauge running gear. Brasseur has a replacement front guide truck with a new spring at a reasonable price, so I'll see if that helps. On the O-36 flat curves it's fine - it only wants to de-rail when there's an elevation change, like an uphill or downhill curve. I know the Railsounds wasn't great on these models, but to me it's just weird that the tower com is clear but the crew talk is garbled. You would think t would be one or the other for both. Maybe, Rick's right - the crew had one too many adult beverages.

 

Lionel Grandpa posted:

Some of the crew talk was intentionally garbled. I don't think anything is wrong, it's supposed to be that way.

Actually, the "unintelligible" crew talk is MUCH more prototypical than some of the silly dialogs Lionel uses in the new Crewtalk/Towercom dialogs.  Although things have generally improved in the sounds department, every now and then voices creep into the dialogs that have no business being utilized.... like the kind where the Dispatcher and/or the Engineer sound like it's their first day on the job!!!    For gosh sakes, Lionel.  Check around for some good voice talent... and use guys who've actually DONE those jobs or at least SOUND LIKE they've done those jobs in real life. 

David

For the front truck, check for interference between the wheels and the cylinder (or if it's on an upgrade, the top of the wheels and the underside of the frame. If on the downslope, see if the lead wheel set is lifting from the track, may not be enough angular motion of the truck to dip down when the engine is going down the hill. One solution to this is to either get a shoulder screw with a little more height, or file out the slot or hole in the lead truck where it attaches in order to give it more ability to move up and down on grades.

Jim

Fargo - you're right and the best part about it is that it wasn't even my $20 !

Grandpa, Rocky and Jon - intentionally garbled crew talk from Lionel - talk about scale realism !  What's next - a case of Bud on the floor of the cab for those long trips ?    Have you heard the voices of Timmy and his mom on the new Legacy passenger set ?  I kind of like the 1950's dialogue.

Steamer - I'm good for right now, but I'm gonna start going to those estate sales, for sure.

Jim - no interference, just seems like not enough weight over the front truck to cause the wheels to "stick" to the track and keep from lifting in the corners (like in oval racing). The pin that holds the spring in place (to "push" the wheels into the track) is pressed in place. I cut it out and tried a longer screw (like you suggested), but then the nut was too thick and bottomed out on the center rail causing a short (don't ask how I know this). I should be able to solder a thin washer in place tonight to mount the longer screw and will try that tonight. I can live with it anyway by just running the engine on the flat sections of track and not the elevated loop. 

Thanks to all. 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×