Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

@Crazy Train posted:

The video also demonstrates that Lionel already has at least 1 prototype built. It looks pretty cool. I bet the triplex will be a big seller.

Now the big question:  is it pronounced like TRIP-lex, or TRY-plex. I use the latter.

According to my dictionary and the online one I use, both pronunciations are correct, so it is really up to individual preference.  I prefer "TRY-plex" myself.  And I think I'm in for the Halloween version...

Andy

Simulating a lightened fuel depleted tender with the wheel slip is an awesome effect. I am sure the wheels either lift a couple of mm off the track when they slip or are mounted that way. Traction tires would get chewed up and would be a bad idea if the wheels aren't lifted. I think the wheels will be flangeless and lifted for effect to avoid wheel and track damage.

One problem I see is the swinging bell. The lanyard tethered to it ought to draw back taught when the bell is pulled back but instead it goes slack. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=widhPHbpv_U&t=8s

Last edited by Dave 69 GTEL
@MartyE posted:

Here's a link to the official brochure.

The wheel slip is pretty darn cool!  The video is below.  Just wait for it to load.

Thats pretty nice.  They've taken the MTH model to the next level.  Be interested to know how the wheel slip actually works. Like what's supporting the front of the tender if the wheels are lifted.

I like the way they put the video links in the catalog brochure too.  Nice feature.

Last edited by Sean's Train Depot

Thats pretty nice.  They've taken the MTH model to the next level.  Be interested to know how the wheel slip actually works. Like what's supporting the front of the tender if the wheels are lifted.

I like the way they put the video links in the catalog brochure too.  Nice feature.

Only question is will they get the Russian Iron color correct.

No lifting necessary. It's easy to do wheel slip. No traction tires on the tender drivers (which will have their own motor) and the wheels will slip easily on the rails. Just run the tender motor faster than the motor in the locomotive and bingo, slipping drivers. There is a 0.0000000001 chance the rails or drivers would be damaged by spinning, even tubular rails. The motor would burn out long before the drivers or rails would get any groves or damage.

@Lou1985 posted:

No lifting necessary. It's easy to do wheel slip. No traction tires on the tender drivers (which will have their own motor) and the wheels will slip easily on the rails. Just run the tender motor faster than the motor in the locomotive and bingo, slipping drivers. There is a 0.0000000001 chance the rails or drivers would be damaged by spinning, even tubular rails. The motor would burn out long before the drivers or rails would get any groves or damage.

This seems like the obvious answer.

They would probably go with the same Russian Blue they used on the recent Camelback. I think Lionel knows that they better get the Russian Blue right at this price point, especially since it's a crucial prototypical color or they will have a lot of very unhappy customers on their hands. So I would be interested in the Matt Shay #2603. The Halloween anyone?

@Lou1985 posted:

No lifting necessary. It's easy to do wheel slip. No traction tires on the tender drivers (which will have their own motor) and the wheels will slip easily on the rails. Just run the tender motor faster than the motor in the locomotive and bingo, slipping drivers. There is a 0.0000000001 chance the rails or drivers would be damaged by spinning, even tubular rails. The motor would burn out long before the drivers or rails would get any groves or damage.

To me it looks like the wheel slippage is only when it’s stopped initially. So to me it appears they don’t apply power to the front motors thus “ locking” them in place. That is why it looks like it’s lifting. The rear tender motor is applying power to non traction tire wheels thus probably slightly “pushing” the front forward and up ever so slightly. Then the front powers up and the rears gain traction slowly.  

edit:  just rewatched and it happens also in motion. So fully agree to quote above. Motor in tender spins faster on non traction tire wheels on command.

Last edited by Pugsly14

Agreed, wheel slip is cool.   However, I would have liked to have seen more steam effects from the cylinders like other Visionline engines.   Other than the wheelslip, whistle smoke and swinging bell (Legacy features) there is no new visual effect that makes this Vi$ionline worthy.  I hope at least they put another speaker up front.   Still though just a tarted up MTH Premier model.   

@Obsidian posted:

Agreed, wheel slip is cool.   However, I would have liked to have seen more steam effects from the cylinders like other Visionline engines.   Other than the wheelslip, whistle smoke and swinging bell (Legacy features) there is no new visual effect that makes this Vi$ionline worthy.  I hope at least they put another speaker up front.   Still though just a tarted up MTH Premier model.   

I really didn't look at any of the features since this engine has no interest for me. I'm not at all sure what else they could possibly pop in it to make it more of a Vision Line engine. What would you want them to pop in there that is or isn't a feature on other engines?  Remember that there is only so much room in and about for things. Was it that engines with cylinder steam effect didn't have whistle steam?

@Obsidian posted:

Agreed, wheel slip is cool.   However, I would have liked to have seen more steam effects from the cylinders like other Visionline engines. 

I also dig the steam cylinder effects. But I think real estate in the boiler is the big killer. I also have to wonder how many smoke units a locomotive can support without frying things from too much current running through. Is that a factor?

Add Reply

Post
This forum is sponsored by Lionel, LLC
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×