Skip to main content

OGR used to have tours of the now closed Weaver plant from York.  It was a lot of fun and got to meet some great people on them  One of the true highlights was seeing Bob Weavers layout   Here are some pics from it

 

1 0121 0141 0151 0161 0171 0181 0201 0211 0221 0231 0241 0251 0271 0281 0291 0301 0321 0331 0341 0351 0361 0371 0381 0391 0401 0411 0421 0431 0441 0471 0481 0491 050

Attachments

Images (33)
  • 1 012
  • 1 014
  • 1 015
  • 1 016
  • 1 017
  • 1 018
  • 1 020
  • 1 021
  • 1 022
  • 1 023
  • 1 024
  • 1 025
  • 1 027
  • 1 028
  • 1 029
  • 1 030
  • 1 032
  • 1 033
  • 1 034
  • 1 035
  • 1 036
  • 1 037
  • 1 038
  • 1 039
  • 1 040
  • 1 041
  • 1 042
  • 1 043
  • 1 044
  • 1 047
  • 1 048
  • 1 049
  • 1 050
Last edited by bluelinec4
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I didn't go on that tour, Ben.  Thanks for those photos.   I did do several of the earliest ones & got the commorative boxcars for each.  Good times.   OGR did a couple visits to the MTH headquarters in Maryland.   I missed going on them.   Perhaps another crack at one of those tours this October OGR guys?    

That was a great layout. I heard that it was taken down. As for Weaver product, I believe they lingered on O scale too much and were too slow in responding to the O gauge market. Not many of their engines ran on anything less than O72 curves.  Weaver made some really fine engines and rolling stock but in the end they were a day too late and a dollar short. It may be sad but the industry is contracting a bit.

I also enjoyed the OGR tours.  Sometimes they had substantial, unexpected bonuses.  One of the Weaver products I was very grateful for were the Reading G1 and G2sa Pacific steam locomotives because they were used on PRSL.  I bought a few with different road numbers at regular retail prices.  For the OGR tour, Weaver made available their remaining inventory at incredibly low prices.  The prices were just too good not to take advantage of. I think I doubled the number of those locomotives I owned on that tour.

I found it interesting that Bob Weaver went from 2-rail to 3-rail O scale.  I regret that I did not go on the tour with his layout included. 

I really liked all the Weaver products.  Their PRR baggage cars were especially nice, everything done right.  I always looked forward to talking to Joe and Gary at York.   

That was a great layout. I heard that it was taken down. As for Weaver product, I believe they lingered on O scale too much and were too slow in responding to the O gauge market. Not many of their engines ran on anything less than O72 curves.  Weaver made some really fine engines and rolling stock but in the end they were a day too late and a dollar short. It may be sad but the industry is contracting a bit.

Thats too bad  Was a great layout   I disagree about Weaver products  Hardly any of them required O72  They were quick to respond to customer requests  Joe brought the Lackawanna Pocono and the cabooses to market in one year   He made models that nobody else would.    The only thing they missed was to update the detailing on their cars  Joe Hayter was and still is a great guy

That was a great layout. I heard that it was taken down. As for Weaver product, I believe they lingered on O scale too much and were too slow in responding to the O gauge market. Not many of their engines ran on anything less than O72 curves.  Weaver made some really fine engines and rolling stock but in the end they were a day too late and a dollar short. It may be sad but the industry is contracting a bit.

As an O scaler, I appreciate that they were singularly focused on O scale.  I don't think they were "slow in responding to the O gauge market" at all.  They had a very diverse product line and most of their products seemed to sell well.  They were the first manufacturer I'm aware of who routinely offered multiple road numbers on both locomotives and rolling stock.  They combined domestic production with imports.  They had quite a number of diesel locomotives that ran on curves tighter than 072.  Their brass steam locomotives had close (if not the same) curve requirements as comparable competitive products.  I don't think it was a matter of being a day late and a dollar short as much as the fact the owner just wanted to retire.  

I think PGentieu got it right with Joe wanting to move on with retirement. I'm sure he exhausted every effort trying to sell the business as a whole.

I still miss Weaver, not only for the product, but for the service too. I'm a big Milwaukee Road fan and they were very generous with their offerings in that regard, especially brass. 

Thanks again Joe and crew.

@milwrd posted:

I think PGentieu got it right with Joe wanting to move on with retirement. I'm sure he exhausted every effort trying to sell the business as a whole.

I still miss Weaver, not only for the product, but for the service too. I'm a big Milwaukee Road fan and they were very generous with their offerings in that regard, especially brass. 

Thanks again Joe and crew.

Paul Fischer, ( who was a member here), was a big influence with the Milwaukee Road offerings by Weaver. Yes, Joe did try to find a buyer, and he was anxious to retire. He told me he and his wife hadn't had a vacation in years due to the business. 

@PGentieu posted:

As an O scaler, I appreciate that they were singularly focused on O scale.  I don't think they were "slow in responding to the O gauge market" at all.  They had a very diverse product line and most of their products seemed to sell well.  They were the first manufacturer I'm aware of who routinely offered multiple road numbers on both locomotives and rolling stock.  They combined domestic production with imports.  They had quite a number of diesel locomotives that ran on curves tighter than 072.  Their brass steam locomotives had close (if not the same) curve requirements as comparable competitive products.  I don't think it was a matter of being a day late and a dollar short as much as the fact the owner just wanted to retire.  

Well said. Totally agree.

Pat

@jim sutter posted:

Some of the nicest and most helpful and kind people that I ever dealt with are in the above picture taken at Weaver's.

Jim:

Totally agree. It was very sad that Joe was unable to sell the business as a going entity, although I'm sure he made the effort. He is a great guy and had terrific employees. Weaver also made excellent products.  

Pat

Was able to make one Layout tour and I think it was the final tour taking us to the Tony Lash layout and then onto MTH.

Why not try your own personal tour?  Three years back, with some fellow club members, we made the trip to see Horseshoe curve and Glitzen Tunnel on the day before York.  We left Long Island early saw both and made it to our York hotel by 7pm. It was a good day of rail-fanning.

@L.I.TRAIN posted:

Was able to make one Layout tour and I think it was the final tour taking us to the Tony Lash layout and then onto MTH.

Why not try your own personal tour?  Three years back, with some fellow club members, we made the trip to see Horseshoe curve and Glitzen Tunnel on the day before York.  We left Long Island early saw both and made it to our York hotel by 7pm. It was a good day of rail-fanning.

Interesting you mention that. My wife and I had planned a trip to the Horseshoe Curve and Steamtown after the April York Meet. With the cancellation of that Meet, we pushed it back to after the October York Meet, although we will also consider deferring it to the LCCA 50th Anniversary Convention next Summer in Scranton. 

Pat

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×