Skip to main content

Hello.   This is my first post.    Thanks for letting me join.

 

I recently bought a Railking GP7.   It has ProtoSound 2, smoke, realistic slow speed.   Its a terrific engine.   The only problem is the way it stops:   So suddenly that it derails the cars it is pulling.    I can throttle it to a slow stop or course, but using the direction control derails 2 or 3 cars.    I used to have an Railking F40, and it did not have this problem.   

 

I have fixed jackrabbit starts on other engines by adding a string of resistors.     But this engine does not have that problem.

 

Thank you for any and all suggestions.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Barry Broskowitz:

Joe,

 

If you purchased the engine used, it's possible that the previous owner used DCS to set the engine's deceleration rate very high. Anyone with a DCS set can reset it for you to factory settings.

Gee Barry,does that apply in conventional? How would he change things if he dont have DCS?

 

Dale H

Dale,   That's the problem with GP7's and 9's.   The body is narrow.    This particular GP7 is packed.   The capacitors sound good, but man I don't see how they'd fit.

 

Barry, This was a new engine.  But it is DCS.   And I guess the vendor could have demo'd the engine, and messed with the settings.   Hope not, because I don't have DCS.

see if there is room to attach it (back to back 1000uf condensers) to either or both motors,that is how k-Line did it. Secure with electrical tape around the motor(s). You could also get single 470 or 1000uf 35V NP ones from and electrical supply,they would be a bit smaller.

 

I do not see how DCS is a factor. When you hit the direction button,you are basically removing power to the motors and the PWM circuit. I do not think there is residual capacitance in the boards to drive motors but I could be wrong.

 

Dale H

Last edited by Dale H

If you are not running DCS (you didn't say), I tend to agree with Dale.  If your layout is set up for conventional so that pressing the direction button cuts all power to the track, the only momentum will be the flywheel.  DCS wouldn't affect it because there is no power to be cut gradually.  If you're running DCS, on the remote there is a way to change the deceleration rate.

I had flywheel-equipped can-motored locos before DCS was invented, and they did coast more than the ancient Lionel.  Derailing cars was never an issue.  Sounds to me like this loco may be binding internally.  I would call MTH tech support.

 

If power is cut and kept off, I don't see why a DCS-equipped loco would coast any better than a non-DCS-equipped, can-motored loco.  I can't see how there could be enough capacitance in a DCS component that could make a noticeable difference in coasting.

 

JoeMack, does it do this if you turn power off and leave it off, or do you give the button a push and release?  This would narrow the possibilities.

I wonder if anyone tried to glue on a piece of lead, flattened into the disc shape of the flywheel and secured it on to the existing flywheel. That would increase flywheel mass and perhaps increase coasting. Looking at my Williams engines, flywheels do not all seem to be the same material. Perhaps MTH wheels are not all the same weight,depending on supply of parts.

 

Dale H

Originally Posted by Dale H:

I wonder if anyone tried to glue on a piece of lead, flattened into the disc shape of the flywheel and secured it on to the existing flywheel. That would increase flywheel mass and perhaps increase coasting.. .

Absolutely.  If you "do the math" and calculate the energy stored in a typical can motor flywheel spinning at 1000 RPM or whatever, the Joules will be equivalent to a ginormous capacitor placed on the electronics side.  Joules for Joule, the mechanical reservoir is more efficient as it is in the desired form whereas the electrical energy must be converted to mechanical work via the motor which is inherently inefficient.

 

Whether or not there's headroom to add to the flywheel (or space to add capacitors for that matter) is a problem left to the student...

Originally Posted by JoeMack:

Thank you for any and all suggestions.

 

Does it abruptly stop the same way going in forward and reverse?

 

I think you have a problem engine since I don't think you should be derailing cars.  That said, if you actually want to tinker with it (rather than just send it in for repair) I would attempt to isolate it to an electrical or mechanical issue.

 

It sounds like you have the shell off.  Can you run the engine up on wood blocks (or whatever) and attach 2 alligator clip cables to apply track power?  One would clip to a center roller, the other to the chassis frame.  Then run the engine and see if it violently brakes when power is removed at different starting speeds.  By lifting the chassis off the track you break the mechanical linkage between the two trucks.  If BOTH motors abruptly stop then it could be an electrical issue since both motors are electrically tied together.  If ONE motor abruptly stops then you could have a mechanical binding in that truck as others have suggested.

 

In what may fall in the "don't try this at home" category I suppose you could attempt a "clean and jerk" lift of a moving chassis off the track to kill track power allowing the trucks to operate independently.  You'd have to grab the engine just right and in the split second after the lift observe what those flywheels are doing.  Just food for thought.

 

From an electrical viewpoint, there are several failure modes in DC motor drive circuits which can cause abrupt motor stoppage when power is removed.  The general principle is when power is removed, the circuit should electrically isolate the motor windings from the drive circuitry.  Otherwise if you load the motor, you get regenerative braking.  If you short the windings you get abrupt stoppage.  So if there is a problem in the isolation mechanism, then you could exhibit your symptoms.  I realize this may not help you at all since there's no end-user troubleshooting guide that I'm aware of for this part of the circuit.  However, one thing you can try if you are up to it is to remove any other loads from the board and confirm you still have the violent stoppage.  There is a 12-pin connector that goes to the lights and speaker, and a 4-pin connector to the smoke unit (if you have smoke).  These two wire harnesses pull straight out.  Leave just the 5-pin connector to the motors and the 7-pin power connector.  You won't have lights or sound but the engine should operate forward, back, change speed, etc.  If the abrupt stopping goes away, then you definitely have an electrical problem.

 

Originally Posted by Barry Broskowitz:

Bob,

DCS wouldn't affect it because there is no power to be cut gradually

Not true.

 

I ran my PS2 engines conventionally before I had DCS and they would coast a bit when power was momentarily cut, as when changing direction.

 

 

 Barry,  I have had 3 or 4 PS2 engines, and they all coasted a bit.   That's what surprised me about this one.

Last edited by JoeMack

I had the engine up on test rollers with the shell off.    There does not appear to be anything binding the motors.    And the problem affects both motors simultaneously.  

 

I sent a message to the vendor about it.    He suggested I find someone with DCS and have them do a "factory reset".    I did so.   But the factory reset made no noticeable difference.   I am waiting to hear what the vendor has to say about that.

 

Stan,   Yes, it does the abrupt stop the same way in both directions.    At this point, I didn't want to remove anything.

 

GGG,    The battery is connected and charged.    It gives the correct shutdown sounds.     Each flywheel turns smooth and easy by hand.  

 

I've been offered a couple of options by the vendor:   Return for full refund, return for repair, or keep with partial refund (waiting to hear exact amount of partial).

JoeMack, what is the model number of this loco and what year was it built?  How many turns of the flywheel does it take, for one complete revolution of the driving wheel?  Most MTH diesels have a gear ratio of 10.5:1.  Is it possible that this one has a different, tighter gear ratio than your other Proto-2 diesels?

 

I've noticed that the flywheels in some of these locos are pretty small.  I've tried cementing brass washers onto the tops of the flywheels in an FT diesel to increase mass for running in conventional mode.  It's difficult to balance them correctly.  And over time the cement loosened and the washer went flying off.  Not a good solution IMO.

 

Personally I would remove each of the motors from their power trucks and inspect the worm gears for burrs.  Also look at the spur gears on side of the truck block.  Make sure there are no broken teeth (it happens!), and nothing caught in the gears.  Then apply fresh grease to the worm gears and reassemble, turning the flywheel slowly by hand as you tighten the motor mounting screw, to ensure a correct mesh.

 

In command-mode operation the PS2 electronics supplement the mechanical energy stored by the flywheels.  I strongly recommend that you test the locomotive on a nearby DCS layout, and also set the deceleration momentum to "1" or "2" for more gradual stops.

 

Good luck and please post your findings here!

Last edited by Ted S

If you still have the engine up on blocks or whatever, here's a simple experiment.  Get the motors running at some nominal speed. Then pull the 5-pin harness that drives the 2 motors (the one with the yellow and white wires).  If the motors abruptly stop as you've been seeing, then it's a mechanical problem in the motor, gears, whatever.  But if the motors gradually spin down, then it's an electrical problem; in other words something in the motor drive circuit is electrically loading down the motors.  I understand that you don't want to take anything apart but I think this would instantly diagnose whether it's mechanical or electrical.  If you think you might be willing to give it a shot, I will make a short video demonstrating what to do.

Ted,

 

The model number is 30-20010, built in 2011.

 

The gear ratio LOOKS like 11:1, but it must be the 10.5:1 you're talking about.

 

I don't want to remove the motors before I'm certain I'm keeping it.   But I will do this later if I wind up keeping it.

 

I had a guy do a "factory reset" on this engine, but it did not help.    Would a factory reset give you a "1" or "2" deceleration?

 

Thanks

Last edited by JoeMack
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×