Skip to main content

I recently purchased an 1872 set and I want to get the shell off and tune up the motor, lube, and basically......have a look around. There's alot of delicate detail on the outside of the shell (can't believe that kids were allowed to play with these). I want to get the shell off without doing damage to the plastic detailing as well as preventing a problem with the handrail that powers the lamp and smoke. From what I've read, if that shorts, the shell will melt.      So......any tips those of you who have worked on this particular engine will be welcome.

Roger

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Yes......I saw that page in Greenberg, but it doesn't say how it's attached to the brush plate. Seems like there's only one way to find out.....take the cab off and see what happens. I have a feeling that downward pressure due to the rail passing through the hole in the cab is what "holds" it to the place. So, we'll see.    Thanks!

That plastic whistle (?) on top of the cab must last about 2 minutes with a child playing with this engine.

Chuck,

It came off just as you described. I'll be tuning up the motor and lubing in there later, but got a chance to look around for spots to add my 1/4 inch lead wire weights to the shell. Can't hurt to have more traction on these things. I found one spot that looked very promising......directly in front of the e-unit down into and towards the pickups. And possibly in the space around the ballast weight. Tight quarters in there.

Chuck Sartor posted:

The big screw under the pilot truck and the one behind the cab and the shell is off. The only parts to watch out for is the steam pipes going to the cylinders. They connect between the body and frame. And the twin piston the operates the air plunger for the smoke.

I recall something by someone had a "double barrel" Or "figure 8" piston, is that what you meant? Maybe Twin-action? Maybe predictive text twisted the sentence? (It gets me anyhow)

 

C.W. or Chuck,

I've got another question for you guys. I just about finished my work on the engine. Cleaned, tuned, lubed, polished.  I just "road tested" it on my layout and it easily pulled a 9 car consist. Very impressive. I had a modern version of this .......crap. Sold it.  Could hardly pull anything compared to this. Anemic smoke......Trainsounds was more like "The Sound of Static"  Thing is......I did not have the ballasted shell on it......running just the chassis. I'll be weighting it with lead later to finish this up. So, it will pull considerably more.

But here's my question. I opened the smoke unit to get a feel for what is in there. It does smoke and it does puff (when the the shell is on, of course). Not sure if everything is ok with the element.  It's got the insulated portion down in the well with just one strand of the ni-chrome wire coming out of it to the terminal at the top of the stack. Is that correct or should it be more substantial?   Couldn't find a part number for the element to get a look at a new one.  If anyone has that number, I may order a spare.  Thanks

That unit only holds a few drops of smokefluid. They aren't great smokers, just ok. And a load helps. Adding weight is a must to pull a load. 9 cars behind a General is a lot already imo., Gramps replaced these smoke wires with resistors, which I believe were in later versions.

I was trying to get a visual on the piston design or operation Chuck. I trust eyeballs more than diagrams... and following links is a pain on this browser.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×