Skip to main content

Scale Trains President Shane Wilson, Michelle Wilson (and their dog bear) visited our Upstate Model Railroad Club (Glens Falls, NY) on Wednesday for several hours. It was a wonderful visit led by our Club President joined by ~ 15 members representing the S, HO, N, O & G scales of the Club. We shared information about our activities, as did Shane and Michelle. We also ran trains. We are most appreciative that Shane and Michelle took time from their busy schedule to visit us.
That evening Scale Trains held a meet and greet “Scale Trains Road Trip” organized by the National Model Railroaders Association - Hudson Berkshire Division at Rensselaer Polytechnical Institute in Troy, NY attended by ~ 100 members & guests. Shane’s presentation of ~ 2 hours was excellent and well received. He covered the history of Scale Trains, showed a video on how their model trains are designed and made, provided general information on upcoming models to be produced and future directions of the company, concluding with an extensive question and answer session.
Scale Trains is clearly well led, managed, and organized with many projects in the works. The company has grown tremendously since its founding a decade ago, and now has ~ 50 employees. It recently acquired the ExactRail HO & N Scale line, Fox Valley Models and partnered with Virtual Railfan. Shane & the firm, in my opinion, are enthusiastic, dedicated, knowledgeable, experienced and have great integrity.
The firm is committed to the hobby, and generally optimistic about the future reflected in investments being made. For more information about the company, I highly recommend exploring their website and videos, and if possible, attending one of their “Road Trips”.
Importantly for us, Scale Trains will announce later this year one new product in S Scale, and next year two.
As I understand it, and I will later correct any errors in my reporting, Scale Trains is uncertain at this time as to their longer-term commitments to our beloved S Scale based largely on overall disappointing purchases by us of their S scale product line to date (sales numbers).
Again, as I understand it, sales of the first freight car S Helper Coal Cars were good at about 1,000 units as planned, recognizing many wanted to support them in their initial offering. [It was reported the firm needs sales of 1,000 units or more to keep prices attractive]. Sales of their second offering S Helper Box Cars declined to ~750 units and this was surprising and disappointing. Sales of their third offering S Helper Cabooses declined again, surprisingly and disappointing to ~500 units, scheduled for shipment this month. There is serious concern and uncertainty as to how sales will be for their next offerings, and this is bringing into question how the firm allocates its limited resources to S Scale, particularly beyond the next three scheduled offerings.
No information was provided about the upcoming offerings, but I believe it is likely to be similar to the most recent, the reissue of prior S Helper (MTH) models using existing purchased tooling. Specifically, due to time investments (generally it takes 1 year or more (new engine closer to 2 years) for new product, tremendous costs for new tooling, and most importantly low potential sales volumes in our scale as compared to HO and N, and concerns about uncertain sales volumes for now and the next several years, we are likely restricted to reissues. Simply, it is a business, cash flow is paramount, risk must be managed, opportunities weighed against each competing project, and it is viewed that overall current opportunities are stronger in the traditional HO and N markets than S.
So, in short to questions I was asked in an earlier posting, I understand there will be no new engines, or track in the forseable future from Scale Trains. With respect to track I was told they would need to invest in building a 5-year supply to be cost effective, and do not wish to invest in the inventory nor manage such at this time. With respect to engines, their motors, boards… need to be designed and manufactured to be consistent with their line and this is not in their near-term planning.
In summary on the positive side, Scale trains will be issuing 3 new offerings over the next 2 years, and if sales are strong, likely we will see future releases. Offsetting this is Scale Trains is uncertain about long-term significant investments in S Scale currently, and is awaiting sales results on the 3 upcoming offerings.
Clearly others on this site know much more then me on these matters as do the employees of the firm, but I quickly wanted to share what I learned and my perspectives with those interested. I would also note at our Club active membership is ~ 25 members, and we are struggling to increase memberships, and only 1-2 are dedicated to S, myself and another member who operates primarily in HO scale, but helps me frequently and has a collection of American Flyer. At the NMRA event I believe the vast majority attending were HO & N scale, possibly with 1 member with interest in S scale.
I hope this information is somewhat helpful and apologize in advance for its length and any errors. Wish I had better news to report. Best to all. Mike West - S Scale Coordinator UMRR.
Note: My background and interest is primarily operating trains generally traditional American Flyer, on SHS / MTH track, with a large investment in Lionel steam and modern engines (both FlyerChief and Legacy). I also have a large collection of American Models engines & cars, and S Helper (SHS) and MTH products, and own 10 S Scale Trains cars, which I am very pleased with the quality and value.
The videos are my Scale Trains cars led by an MTH engine and the caboose is S Helper. Shane stated it was the first S Scale Trains set he had seen & was appreciative.

Attachments

Videos (2)
IMG_1462
IMG_1461
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Gunny,

Thanks. Many of us I believe have been able to find several of the cars desired in the secondary market at acceptable prices such as Portlines..., and I understand the offerings were of limited appeal to many.

You very well could be right they might drop out, but greatly hoping you are not . I was and still am so hoping as many others Scale Trains will find success. Best. Mike

Last edited by Mike West

Please allow me, as the webmaster of the NASG web site (nasg.org) to offer a bit of contrary news to the "doom-n-gloom". In the past year and a half we have seen a significant (percentage-wise and absolute numbers) uptick in visitors to the NASG's web site. It seems each month in the past 6 months, we have been setting a new record for the number of unique visitors to the site. We are now at near double the traffic we were getting just a year ago, and near triple where we were two years ago. The interest in S is way higher than I could have imagined from all of the gloom that we always read about. If you are an NASG member, you can log into the "Members Only" section of the web site and see the actual metrics (we consider this private data, hence the log-in requirement). The NASG leadership has been working hard at improving S' outreach efforts.

Another interesting observation is that many organizations are loosing memberships, primarily due to the average age of their members, and the simple fact that we are on the other side of the "bell curve" of the "Baby Boomers" generation. However, I have been the NASG's webmaster for over 12 years now and the NASG's membership has remained steady; no decline. As an example, I am also a member of the PRR historical society and its numbers are declining, with presumably a similar age demographic. So, as some NASG members are going to the Great Train Station in the Sky, many new (and presumably younger) people are joining at the same time.

(next is my personal opinion on the topic at hand, and not related to the NASG...)

I bought both the hoppers and box cars from Scale Trains. They fall outside my modeled era, but I wanted to support their effort. The caboose is an entirely different matter. Unless one models the railroad for which the caboose is decorated, there is little modeling justification to buy one. So, the numbers the original poster stated do not surprise me; what did surprise me was that Scale Trains chose the caboose; I would think that they would have chosen something that more of us could have gotten behind. I am a PRR modeler, so there is no way I could justify an ATSF caboose, for example. But, since I am a PRR modeler, I could justify a N&W hopper.

(...end of my personal opinion).

We have three main companies providing S products: Lionel, American Models, and Scale Trains. American Models seems to have recovered from Ron Bashista's sudden passing, and they are currently producing new paint schemes (americanmodels.com). Then, there are a ton of small "mom-n-pop" type companies that are producing S-scale products. 3D-printing has revolutionized the market, and the amount of product available in S is almost too much to keep up with. Yes, you have to do some actual modeling by building a kit, painting, etc. Yes, there may be fewer R-T-R products available, but building and putting one's own sweat-equity into a model makes it so much more meaningful. On the NASG web site there are currently over 600 companies listed that are producing SOMETHING for S, today! (click on the "Resources" button of the web site). That's nothing to sneeze at, in my opinion.

I was in N-scale until 2008, and there is nothing that is going to persuade me to leave S.

- Peter Vanvliet

Peter, thanks for your reply and factual input. I purchased eleven cars from Scale Trains including four of the cabooses. None of them for roads I model, but because I wanted to support ST. I model the PRR and have NYC, Erie, B&O, NPR and a few other interchange lines.

I am part of your statistics in that my visits to NASG.org are 10x what they were two years ago. I see two issues. One, Scale Trains needs to make Hypotypical (their term) cabooses and boxcars. Even SHS did that. I just bought an SHS Cayahoga Valley covered hopper. A total fantasy, but it theoretically fits with the PRR. Second, it seems most S gauge purchasers are unwilling to pay the price for new, good products. They are not cheap to make. A third lesser issue is the lack of .138 rail numbered turnouts.

Peter,

Thanks for the information provided and I will try to share with Scale Trains. And thank you also for sharing the positives of our beloved S Scale. Our Club strives outreach for our hobby in many ways, we have free Open Houses each month, display our portable layouts at parades, historical sites, craft fairs... We also display Christmas layouts at hotels, museums... And we operate trains at several nursing homes just as an fyi. Best. Mike - S Scale Coordinator for the Upstate Model Railroaders in Glens Falls NY.

Attachments

Videos (3)
IMG_2096
Library 819.23
IMG_2252
Last edited by Mike West

Tom,

I spoke with Shane Lambert at the Mad City train show in Madison, WI , he tolde he was working on high rail turnouts but would not market them til he was satisfied with their strength in operation. If I'm not mistaken he is continuing Tomalco track, he mentioned that he was concerned with lack of people asking about high rail numbered turnouts.

Ray

@Rayin"S" posted:

Tom,

I spoke with Shane Lambert at the Mad City train show in Madison, WI , he tolde he was working on high rail turnouts but would not market them til he was satisfied with their strength in operation. If I'm not mistaken he is continuing Tomalco track, he mentioned that he was concerned with lack of people asking about high rail numbered turnouts.

Ray

People are not contacting him probably because they are not aware he has them...which he doesn't yet.  I had too many orders, I couldn’t begin to keep up with demand.  OTOH my Hi-rail turnouts also allowed for scale operation without modification and Flyer, also.  Too bad he can’t incorporate that feature in them.  Finding SHS profile code 138 rail is a major problem, also.  I was told he might be using Micro Engineering code 132 for Hi-rail.  IIRC, the ME rail is really for 0 gauge with a 0 gauge profile and the proportions are off for S, in particular, the width of the rail head.  0 gauge size stuff doesn’t always translate to well S.  I bought some 60” 0 gauge steam drivers to convert an Atlantic to 80” drivers for a more scale look but the spokes are way too ‘heavy’ compared to S.

I believe Ed L’s son is also making scale turnouts using Fast Track jigs.  I would think two people manufacturing turnouts could easily out strip demand for scale turnouts.  And then the NASG want to help fund somebody to make more scale turnouts.  It’s probably my not really understanding the market, but I just don’t get it.  Oh well, I do wish them well, though.

Tom Stoltz

in Maine

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×