Skip to main content

A couple of these 6 car sets would be perfect.

Image:Price:Title:Details:

 ZOOM
Was:
$329.95
Now:
$299.95
6-Car 36’ Woodsided Reefer Set - Pacific Fruit Express
Stock Number:
20-90692
Gauge:
O/O-27 Gauge
Manufacturer:
MTH Premier
Product Type:
Freight Cars
Availability:
In Stock
<input name="View_Details" type="submit" value="View Details" />
 

 ZOOM
Was:
$329.95
Now:
$299.95
6-Car 36’ Woodsided Reefer Set - Pacific Fruit Express
Stock Number:
20-90693
Gauge:
O/O-27 Gauge
Manufacturer:
MTH Premier
Product Type:
Freight Cars
Availability:
In Stock

Marty

 

Despite the thousands of models of extended vision UP cabooses that have been made in all scales over the years the UP never owned an extended vision caboose.

 

My first O scale UP caboose was an extended vision caboose too.  That was before MTH and Lionel came out with their CA-1 and CA-3/CA-4 models in the mid 2000s.

 

When other railroads were buying steel cabooses like the International Car standard and extended vision types the UP stuck with their own design that was used for their CA-3 through CA-10 classes of caboose.

 

The CA-11 and CA-12 were UP custom design bay window cabooses that have not been made by a major O scale manufacturer.

 

The UP only had one class steel cabooses built to a standard commercial design.  The UP purchased 130 bay window cabooses between 1967 and 1970 and leased them to the Rock Island.  When the Rock Island went bankrupt in 1980 the cabooses were returned to the UP and Classed as CA-13s.  The Atlas Trainman, K-Line, Lionel and MTH bay window cabooses all approximate the UP CA-13 class caboose.

 

And on the other side of that coin, no other major railroad ever bought steel cabooses built to UP designs.  So all those CA-3 and CA-4 Lionel cabooses in eastern railroad heritage schemes are just as much a fantasy as their pain jobs. 

 

The same goes for MTH CA-1s in several road names like SP&S or NYC.  The SP did have a large number of cabooses built to a "Common Standard" shared with the UP in the Harriman era and the MTH CA-1 is a good representation of those SP cabooses.

 

In the case of both Lionel and MTH I think they use fantasy paint schemes, like Heritage scheme freight cars, to put some mileage on tooling for less common models.

 

While that may be true Ted, I was never one to worry about that.  But thanks for the information.  Maybe I'll buy another caboose and put this one on a siding.Originally Posted by Ted Hikel:

Marty

 

Despite the thousands of models of extended vision UP cabooses that have been made in all scales over the years the UP never owned an extended vision caboose.

 

My first O scale UP caboose was an extended vision caboose too.  That was before MTH and Lionel came out with their CA-1 and CA-3/CA-4 models in the mid 2000s.

 

When other railroads were buying steel cabooses like the International Car standard and extended vision types the UP stuck with their own design that was used for their CA-3 through CA-10 classes of caboose.

 

The CA-11 and CA-12 were UP custom design bay window cabooses that have not been made by a major O scale manufacturer.

 

The UP only had one class steel cabooses built to a standard commercial design.  The UP purchased 130 bay window cabooses between 1967 and 1970 and leased them to the Rock Island.  When the Rock Island went bankrupt in 1980 the cabooses were returned to the UP and Classed as CA-13s.  The Atlas Trainman, K-Line, Lionel and MTH bay window cabooses all approximate the UP CA-13 class caboose.

 

And on the other side of that coin, no other major railroad ever bought steel cabooses built to UP designs.  So all those CA-3 and CA-4 Lionel cabooses in eastern railroad heritage schemes are just as much a fantasy as their pain jobs. 

 

The same goes for MTH CA-1s in several road names like SP&S or NYC.  The SP did have a large number of cabooses built to a "Common Standard" shared with the UP in the Harriman era and the MTH CA-1 is a good representation of those SP cabooses.

 

In the case of both Lionel and MTH I think they use fantasy paint schemes, like Heritage scheme freight cars, to put some mileage on tooling for less common models.

 

 

Big Boys were designed to move freight over the continental divide without the use of helpers.  While this did include moving coal the over riding concern was to get trains over the Wasatch range without helpers.  The engineering dept designed the engine to be fast as well as powerful and moving coal doesn't usually require higher speeds.

Originally Posted by MilwRdPaul:

If I'm not mistaken, the UP got the big boys to haul coal out of the Wyoming Powder Basin.

Not only no, but H$ll NO!  There wasn't even any main line trackage into the "Powder River Coal Basin" until the massive supplies of coal was discovered in the early 1970s. The UP got most of their coal from the Hana Coal Mine, right on their own Overland Route main line.

Originally Posted by MartyE:

       
Yeah we already discussed that a few posts up about how I didn't care but thanks for playing.
 
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by MartyE:

I ot this one for my Big Boy.

 

Total fantasy!!!

 


       


Yes but the topic of this thread is about what correct rolling stock to pull behind the Big Boy, not incorrect ones and whether one cares if it's correct or not.
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×