Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Fredstrains:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:

Are you inquiring about the REAL New York Central and heavyweight vs. lightweight streamlined passenger cars?

YES!!

OK then. The REAL New York Central Hudson class locomotives hauled MAINLY heavyweight passenger cars. The term "madison cars" was/is a Lionel term, as NO railroad actually had "Madison Cars", i.e. they were all referred to has heavyweights.

 

The NYC obviously entered the world of lightweight, streamlined passenger equipment with the introduction of their STREAMLINED 20th Century Limited, in 1938. Thus, the NYC Hudson classes also handled streamlined passenger equipment. Obviously, some of the NYC Hudsons where also streamlined, but even those eventually lost their streamlined shrouds, but still continued to handle both heavyweight AND streamlined passenger consists.

The 700E had a set of metal passenger cars commonly called the Rail Chief cars.  These cars were streamlined and were similar to the articulated passenger cars of the Hiawatha set. So yes, the Lionel 700E did pull streamlined passenger cars.

 

The 763E came in sets with stamped metal constructed "heavyweight" cars. These cars were much shorter than the  phenolic cars that came with the 773 in 1950.  I do not believe that the 700E had a set with the phenolic heavyweight cars, at least officially from Lionel. One could certainly put such a set together.

Originally Posted by WBC:

The 700E had a set of metal passenger cars commonly called the Rail Chief cars.  These cars were streamlined and were similar to the articulated passenger cars of the Hiawatha set. So yes, the Lionel 700E did pull streamlined passenger cars.

 

The 763E came in sets with stamped metal constructed "heavyweight" cars. These cars were much shorter than the  phenolic cars that came with the 773 in 1950.  I do not believe that the 700E had a set with the phenolic heavyweight cars, at least officially from Lionel. One could certainly put such a set together.

It is my impression that the original poster is discussing the PROTOTYPICAL use of New York Central Hudson class locomotives. It is also my understanding that the famous Lionel 700E NYC Hudson model was indeed "SCALE" and was NOT lettered "Lionel Lines". 

Originally Posted by Rockyroad:

Fred

Lionel and K-line make some very nice green, heavy-weight, cars in NYC and Pullman lettering. Your not restricted to the "Madison" offering for heavy-weight cars.

True, I have a pretty nice "set" of MTH two-tone gray NYC heavyweight passenger cars, that I run with LOTS of headend express cars. Although I prefer the Golden Gate Depot 21" scale heavyweights, once I up-graded the MTH cars to "close coupled" with Kadee couplers, the look very nice behind any of my NYC Hudsons.

Fred, do you model a particular era or just run trains? If you model the '30s - early '40s then green heavyweights would be the norm or all two tone gray heavyweight cars for the Pacemaker train. After WWII as passenger service declined then streamliners and mixed trains would have been more common especially in the '50s when the streamlining came off the engines.

 

Pete

Did not Know Madison Cars were strictly a Lionel Name given to those Kind of cars!!!

 

 

Actually Lionel never used that name except on the side of a car.  The use of "Madison Cars" as a generic term for heavyweight passenger cars is a modern era O gauge phenomenon.  You can read discussion of that topic here.

 

https://ogrforum.com/t...ly=21984675555882691

 

For a look at real Hudsons in color action watch here thanks to the miracle of Kadachrome.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Originally Posted by Norton:

Fred, do you model a particular era or just run trains? If you model the '30s - early '40s then green heavyweights would be the norm or all two tone gray heavyweight cars for the Pacemaker train. After WWII as passenger service declined then streamliners and mixed trains would have been more common especially in the '50s when the streamlining came off the engines.

 

Pete

When the streamlining came off engines in the 50's, why was this done? Was it a style/fashion thing, that is, art deco was seen as old hat, or was it purely a practical, technical decision?

Originally Posted by Dave Allen:
Originally Posted by Norton:

Fred, do you model a particular era or just run trains? If you model the '30s - early '40s then green heavyweights would be the norm or all two tone gray heavyweight cars for the Pacemaker train. After WWII as passenger service declined then streamliners and mixed trains would have been more common especially in the '50s when the streamlining came off the engines.

 

Pete

When the streamlining came off engines in the 50's, why was this done? Was it a style/fashion thing, that is, art deco was seen as old hat, or was it purely a practical, technical decision?

I recall reading somewhere that after one of the Dreyfuss Husdons was in a grade crossing collision in 1945, NYC management ordered all streamlining be removed.

 

Rusty

Originally Posted by Fredstrains:
Originally Posted by Tinplate Art:

I run a 4-car set of Lionel NYC two-tone gray heavyweights (from 1996) behind my Vision Line 700E Hudson and they look great! The white stripes and white sans seraph "NEW YORK CENTRAL" lettering are salient accents on these cars.

Do you have any Lionel Product Numbers or pictures  for these cars?

 

FREDSTRAINS

The catalog number for the set is 6-19079.

 

Originally Posted by Mikado 4501:
Originally Posted by Fredstrains:
Originally Posted by Tinplate Art:

I run a 4-car set of Lionel NYC two-tone gray heavyweights (from 1996) behind my Vision Line 700E Hudson and they look great! The white stripes and white sans seraph "NEW YORK CENTRAL" lettering are salient accents on these cars.

Do you have any Lionel Product Numbers or pictures  for these cars?

 

FREDSTRAINS

The catalog number for the set is 6-19079.

 

That is exactly what I'm looking for. Now If I can just find a Set on the Forum or York!

 

FREDSTRAINS

Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:
Originally Posted by Dave Allen:
Originally Posted by Norton:

Fred, do you model a particular era or just run trains? If you model the '30s - early '40s then green heavyweights would be the norm or all two tone gray heavyweight cars for the Pacemaker train. After WWII as passenger service declined then streamliners and mixed trains would have been more common especially in the '50s when the streamlining came off the engines.

 

Pete

When the streamlining came off engines in the 50's, why was this done? Was it a style/fashion thing, that is, art deco was seen as old hat, or was it purely a practical, technical decision?

I recall reading somewhere that after one of the Dreyfuss Husdons was in a grade crossing collision in 1945, NYC management ordered all streamlining be removed.

 

Rusty

Removing the streamlining also had an economical effect.  Made it easier to perform maintenance & repairs on the locomotives (read: lower maintenance & labor costs).  NYC certainly wasn't the only railroad that got into the practice of removing streamlining off their locomotives.

Originally Posted by Ted Hikel:

Did not Know Madison Cars were strictly a Lionel Name given to those Kind of cars!!!

 

 

Actually Lionel never used that name except on the side of a car.  The use of "Madison Cars" as a generic term for heavyweight passenger cars is a modern era O gauge phenomenon.  You can read discussion of that topic here.

 

https://ogrforum.com/t...ly=21984675555882691

 

For a look at real Hudsons in color action watch here thanks to the miracle of Kadachrome.

 

 

 Those shots of the Dreyfus Hudson with matching train were incredible, thanks!

 

 

 

 

 

Most of the streamlining came was removed during WW-2.  The metal involved was often aluminum and was needed for war material.  The railroad crews didn't mind because in most cases the "streamlining" was a PITA as far as access to things that needed maintenance were concerned.  Once the war was over the handwriting was on the wall about the long term life expectancy of steam was concerned.  Some of the railroads did build a few new engines after the war and equipped them with roller bearings and automatic lubrication.  Even with these costs savings on labor the diesel was still incredibly cheaper to own/operate.

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×