Originally Posted by Puclot:
Thanks for this. this is very helpful. so basically it means that when tracks are parallel, curve size does not matter. as long as they are same.
in the first option i could have used a 48 inch as well, correct?
in the second ption, when you said a lot of real estate, you meant within the loops itself, right?
Is there some resource or book which i can refer to to learn more about these. for most of you, its second nature but for someone like me who is just 30 days into this, this is mind boggling
Thanks
Puc
I'm not sure what you mean by curve size no mattering. It makes a difference in Puc1. Since the switch is integrated into the curves then you have to use switches that match the curve radius. For instance you can't (not easily anyway) use O36 switches to go from an O60 to O48 loop like in Puc1. But you could do that in Puc2 and Puc3 since the switches are not part of the curves in the loop.
Yes, I meant within the loops.
There is a book on fastrack plans but the one I'm aware of doesn't have very good reviews, so I let others with experience make a recommendation.
Originally Posted by Puclot:
Hi Bruce, for the transition between loop, will both the swiches be not RH or LH rather than 1 RH and 1 LH
On Puc1, you'll need two RH and Two LH when going from one loop to another. A LH and RH go together on the left and a RH and LH go together on the right.
If you want I'll design a layout for you in RR Track (an autocad software) and that way you'll know exactly what to get. I just need to know what size layout you want to build.