Skip to main content

MTH has had a license agreement for the last few years to market their tinplate trains using the Lionel name. Does that fact cause you buy more tinplate trains? Would you purchase the same trains if they said MTH instead of Lionel? I would like to know why either way.

Scott Smith

Last edited by scott.smith
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

BlueComet400 posted:

Regardless of the agreement, I don't like the fact that MTH is using the Lionel name on tinplate reproductions.  Bottom line, they are reproductions and should be marked as such. I think the trains are well-done, but I have little to no interest in owning them; when it comes to tinplate, I want original prewar Lionel. 

John

MTH has never hid the fact they are reproductions weather it has the MTH stamp on the bottom or Lionel Corp. Most of the reproductions like “Lionel classics “ were made by MTH anyway.  In answer to the original question is no; I like the Lionel badging but it’s not a deal breaker for me either way.  MTH has taken tinplate way over the top in sound,smoke and finish and have allowed many in our hobby to obtain beautiful high quality tinplate of today. 

3951AC55-6074-4664-A83D-DE4E5A2BADF596010C65-61E6-4DC0-89AA-2E07AB7AB3A7

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 3951AC55-6074-4664-A83D-DE4E5A2BADF5
  • 96010C65-61E6-4DC0-89AA-2E07AB7AB3A7
Last edited by Chris Lonero

MTH has never hid the fact they are reproductions weather it has the MTH stamp on the bottom or Lionel Corp. Most of the reproductions like “Lionel classics “ were made by MTH anyway. 

If the items aren't clearly marked as reproductions then they are hiding the fact that they are reproductions. Doesn't matter who is doing the manufacturing and marketing.

Reproductions are a problem across the world of collecting, it ain't just trains.

I RUN my tinplate trains.  I'm pleased that new ones are being produced so that I can run a good-looking train without cleaning up a bunch of rust or worrying about 90 year old wiring.  Nobody is going to mistake new production for the originals, and Lionel is well within its rights to have MTH manufacture trains from the old designs.  

I prefer Lionel markings, but I'm happy to buy the trains marked "MTH", as the lack of a Lionel badge has made them less expensive.

I actually would prefer the MTH Logo on my modern tinplate.  While I still buy some lionel, most of my new acquistion power is either prewar or modern mth, that goes for everything not just tinplate.  I know companies need to adapt to survive but I still find it incredulous that the LCT agreement even exists given the lawsuit history between MTH and Lionel. ( Yes I know lionel has re-incorporated since then)

Frankly as some one who only recently succumbed to the shiny side, It was rather confusing as to why only repro's are made in the first place.  I would rather see tinplate style trains in new configurations such as 6 wheel driver sets, Camel back loco's etc. Heck for that matter just deliver the 263E I have on order from the 2016 tinplate catalog before you issue 2019 vol 1!

Just my $0.02.  

jhz563 posted:

  I know companies need to adapt to survive but I still find it incredulous that the LCT agreement even exists given the lawsuit history between MTH and Lionel. ( Yes I know lionel has re-incorporated since then)

It's very simple.  Lionel would not get their return on investment to start production of tinplate for such a small market.  As I recall, they tried to re-introduce their own tinplate about a decade or so ago, then decided it was better to license to MTH.

Rusty

I love tinplate--always have and always will! Sold nearly all of my "larger" O gauge tinplate locomotives--all of which were contemporary items from MTH--prior to my move last year, but I still have most of the "smaller" O gauge engines and rolling stock from both MTH and Lionel. I'm one of those strange birds who likes his tin in pristine condition and not cosmetically "well-played-with." I could not care less whose logo is on these items. The stuff MTH has been offering with either their own logo or the LCT logo is absolutely gorgeous, and I only hope they will continue to make these wonderful trains for years to come. If MTH does not continue tinplate production, you can be pretty sure it will not be done at all. The market for contemporary tinplate is likely not large enough to entice Lionel or anyone else to dive in.

Mallard4468 posted:

I RUN my tinplate trains.  I'm pleased that new ones are being produced so that I can run a good-looking train without cleaning up a bunch of rust or worrying about 90 year old wiring.

This is exactly how I feel, I like my stuff to look pristine. I'm fine restoring trains, but, I like running them too... so If I'm going to drop a lot of money on a set I'd prefer it to be in good shape. I've got about a 50/50 mix of reproductions and originals and run all of them with no bias towards 1 or the other, they are toys and I treat them as such.

In many cases there is little difference between the originals and the repros, I think sticking only to originals is more of a prestige thing than anything else. 

As long as it looks good and is made well, I'm happy

Repro items should be like the original, down to the logo, as long as there is identification on the body of the fact. Look at Lionel PWC items, which are marked as such because they are not the Lionel Corporation-manufactured originals. The license earns money for today's Lionel, and further advances the name. Perhaps when the license expires, Mike will make a move on the company as a whole. 

I seem to recall that when Josh Cowen acquired Ives at the beginning of the 30's, Ives Trains continued to carry that label for a year or two, although they were owned by Lionel. (I know that's not a perfect simile, but....)

In any event, the original items were made by Lionel Corporation, which divested its train manufacturing circa 1969 and no longer exists, so who cares what logo is on the repros, as long as they look good and run well.

I always liked the MTH accessories, i.e., lamp posts, signals, structures, etc.  The repro trains themselves never appealed to me initially because they had all been "done before."  But when MTH started making tinplate in color combinations as well as rolling stock with prototypical road names, I started to take notice.  It was all new... and "original."  As I've often said, Lionel never made a 2817 Pennsylvania caboose, let alone one with interior lights, but MTH did!  While I can't say I'm impressed with everything Mike and his team have done over the years, they've introduced affordable tinplate to a new generation of enthusiasts and I for one hope they continue their efforts.

Pre-War Steve posted:

I always liked the MTH accessories, i.e., lamp posts, signals, structures, etc.  The repro trains themselves never appealed to me initially because they had all been "done before."  But when MTH started making tinplate in color combinations as well as rolling stock with prototypical road names, I started to take notice.  It was all new... and "original."  As I've often said, Lionel never made a 2817 Pennsylvania caboose, let alone one with interior lights, but MTH did!  While I can't say I'm impressed with everything Mike and his team have done over the years, they've introduced affordable tinplate to a new generation of enthusiasts and I for one hope they continue their efforts.

I'm a big fan of the new road names. I really don't care about traditional tinplate rolling stock. Give me the new paint schemes. I love the Hooker Chemical Tank car, the Pennsylvania, New York Central and B&O boxcars. I'll buy these until my wife leaves me over having too many of them. I like the Lionel Orange Heritage series and the purple Tinplate Traditions set. I don't have to have the Lionel name on anything. I have a Proto 2 Blue Comet with the MTH nameplate. I'm not going to replace them with a Lionel nameplate.
     One thing I did notice in the pictures posted on this thread. The tinplate L logo looks great on the engines. Perhaps MTH need to use their color logo on their Tinplate Traditions engines. In the past their nameplate has been a black M.T.H. on a silver plate. The MTH Blue Comet logo in color would look better. In tinplate, color counts.

Scott Smith

Yes, the Lionel name on my tinplate is important to me.

I am new to Standard gauge, it started last summer after I saw the awesome SGMA layout at the TCA Pittsburgh Convention. Seeing these shiny beasts running around on a BIG layout...it totally blew me away! Plus, what put it over the top was I found out that the new locos had all the modern features that I like: they come with Protosounds 2 or Protosounds  3 giving me remote control, cruise control, smoke, sounds, LED lighting, station stops etc.

I knew I had to be a part of Standard gauge. I could not stop thinking about it every day after I got home, after a few weeks I finally took the plunge.

I had a fever, and the only cure was a Blue Comet set!

So far I have only bought modern Standard gauge "Lionel" reproductions. (I leave the "MTH" reproductions for others)

Last edited by Craignor
Brian Liesberg posted:

... In many cases there is little difference between the originals and the repros, I think sticking only to originals is more of a prestige thing than anything else.

but you don't mention the most important difference... i constantly lament about the fact that my prewar and postwar trains have no "Certificate of Authenticity".  whatever will i do when it comes time to sell them?!?

overlandflyer posted:
Brian Liesberg posted:

... In many cases there is little difference between the originals and the repros, I think sticking only to originals is more of a prestige thing than anything else.

but you don't mention the most important difference... i constantly lament about the fact that my prewar and postwar trains have no "Certificate of Authenticity".  whatever will i do when it comes time to sell them?!?

Any trains possible resale price is never a consideration when I buy it. I live in the present concerned only about the happiness my trains currently provide me. The future is guaranteed for no one and I won't be around anyway to see what my heirs get for them when I'm gone.

ogaugeguy posted:

Any trains possible resale price is never a consideration when I buy it. I live in the present concerned only about the happiness my trains currently provide me. The future is guaranteed for no one and I won't be around anyway to see what my heirs get for them when I'm gone.

I'm with you! I buy what I like and could not care less about future value. Truth be told, there are going to be a great many folks who will be very disappointed when, at some point down the road, they hope to profit when selling their trains. There was a time when that was most certainly possible, but for the most part, and with few exceptions, those times are gone. Just the reality of changed and still-changing times. The nameplate on the side of the item won't make much difference at all.

Last edited by Allan Miller

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×