Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Rob Pisani:

I just wanted to clarify one point.  The minimum radius on these will be 36" for the 2-Rail version.  The "scale" 3-Rail version will operate on O-72 minimum, but alternate connectors will be provided so the cars can be modified to operate on O-54 curves.

 

Look for an official announcement (with pricing) very soon!

Rob,

Thank you for the announcement.

I sent you an email with SCL&L&N/Family Lines System,CSX&Seaboard System pictures of 4750 cu ft covered hoppers-did you ever receive them?

Thank you,

Al Hummel

SP, Definitely agree these will be attention getters.   And hopefully open the flood gates for additional modern releases! 
 
Originally Posted by Alan Hummel:
Originally Posted by superpower:

The Atlas O 5161 hoppers sold very well because it was/is a superbly detailed model of a modern and current prototype. The Atlas Maxi IV will make a statement probably bolder than the 5161 hoppers and grab the attention of other hobbyist and model railroaders in other scales. These new cars can potentially open the flood gates for more modern articulated cars, which would be nice!

 

Now how about some Trinity RD-4 hoppers, 64' reefer, 3281 hopper, PC&F 62' insulated boxcar. 

Add to the "wish list," GP 40-2s,38-2s,centerbeam lumber cars,&Trinity 2 bay covered hoppers,like American Limited now has for sale in HO.

Al Hummel

 

Thanks Rob.  As you can tell excitement is building and I think if you delivered tomorrow these cars would be sold out as soon as they hit the dealer shelves. 
 
Originally Posted by Rob Pisani:

I just wanted to clarify one point.  The minimum radius on these will be 36" for the 2-Rail version.  The "scale" 3-Rail version will operate on O-72 minimum, but alternate connectors will be provided so the cars can be modified to operate on O-54 curves.

 

Look for an official announcement (with pricing) very soon!

 

Originally Posted by Alan Hummel:
Originally Posted by Rob Pisani:

I just wanted to clarify one point.  The minimum radius on these will be 36" for the 2-Rail version.  The "scale" 3-Rail version will operate on O-72 minimum, but alternate connectors will be provided so the cars can be modified to operate on O-54 curves.

 

Look for an official announcement (with pricing) very soon!

Rob,

Thank you for the announcement.

I sent you an email with SCL&L&N/Family Lines System,CSX&Seaboard System pictures of 4750 cu ft covered hoppers-did you ever receive them?

Thank you,

Al Hummel

Al,

 

I don't recall seeing it.  If there are too many large photos attached our system might have rejected it.  Please try again.

 

Thanks!

It's happening Mike!  The big L just announced the eight-door version of the 86ft long auto parts box cars.
 
More great options out there for those of us running current-day locos.
 
Originally Posted by Mike DeBerg:
SP, Definitely agree these will be attention getters.   And hopefully open the flood gates for additional modern releases! 
 

 

Martin,
 
Yeah, I found them online
 
 
Thanks!
 
Originally Posted by Martin H:
It's happening Mike!  The big L just announced the eight-door version of the 86ft long auto parts box cars.
 
More great options out there for those of us running current-day locos.
 
Originally Posted by Mike DeBerg:
SP, Definitely agree these will be attention getters.   And hopefully open the flood gates for additional modern releases! 
 

 

 

Originally Posted by Mike DeBerg:

       

Absolutely! Was hoping to see these cars by EOY but seems like a mid to late 2016 offering now?


        With this much of an announcement delay, no way we'll see these by year-end 2015.  Thought I read Atlas-O has the latest CZ announcement scheduled for 3Q2016 delivery.  My bet would be at least a year from now.  At least!

David

Originally posted by Martin H:

 

For example:  The bulkhead gunderson cars were made in the 80's, quickly to be replaced with the Maxi-I prototype in 1988-1990. 

Oh really? HOw many Railroads and Private co's leased into them? I only know of Two TTX and Maersk. Are you sure you are not confused with the Maxi Stack IV? And what do you mean by outdated? The Gunderson Twin Stacks are still rolling. 40' is the Norm for Overseas Containers. Wen't the Maxi Stack I's 48' which has fallen out of flavor? Didn't TTX do a Rebuild Program with manyif not MOST of their 48' well cars including the maxi stack I's to either cut down the wells to 40' or expand the wells to 53'?

 

The Maxi-I was so successful (while the twin stacks were quickly outdated) such that Gunderson did another run of them in 2001-era.  So why did MTH and Atlas make the bulkhead twin stacks?  Were they trying to limit their customer as narrowly as possible?

Well I don't know about MTH other than by my observation that they just copied, cheapened, and rode on the success of the Atlas O product. MTH's Twin Stacks debut in 2007 while Atlas O was on a second run for their cars which originally debut in 2005.

 

I can tell you this from the atlas O perspective that I pitched for these Gunderson Twin Stack cars on way back the Atlas O forum and face to face Jim Weaver at the turn of the century. I picked them because of all the stack cars out there [MTH with the 48' stand alones, K-line with the Thrall articulated as well as the shortened Gundersons, Lionel with their Shortened Gundersons] these Twin Stacks would:

1] stand out in the Intermodal O gauge Model world and

2] came in a variety of RR's and colors and

3] was in the time frame that Jim Weaver was focusing in for Models [the colorful  1970's to the 1990's! 

 

How colorful was the MAxi Stack 1 again? Perhapse TTX yeller and Maersk Baby Blue?

 

Is there a link to the interview that can be shared, and/or a report on the specifics?
 
I believe Altas should move forward with other types of stack cars, the latest in Gunderson 48' All Purpose, 53' Thrall triple and 40' well cars. 
Having only one type of well car is not enough.
 
I had written an email to Altas around 2010 recommending modern stack cars.
Atlas, thank you for listening to all of us.
 
 
Originally Posted by hibar:

If you are a Model Railroader subscriber todays newsletter includes a video interview with Rob Pisani from Atlas at the Portland show discussing this new model with the MR rep Cody Grivno.

 

Last edited by MikesRR

I am not familiar with posting links, Rob said official announcement with pricing later this month [Sept] and estimated delivery late 1QTR or 2QTR 2016 [good luck with that] he described Jindo containers with different end and door styles, diecast cars with etched parts, very heavy [I am thinking very similar to the Lionel Huskystacks construction]

Mike,

I share your excitement for these Maxi-Stack cars. Would you or someone else on this thread know which road names are appropriate for specific railroads? It is obvious for BNSF & Florida East Coast but which railroads use TTX & BRAN? I remember seeing both TTX & Pacer intermodal cars on my road trips but I don’t remember which railroads were hauling them. Also since intermodal trains from railroads in the western US are passed on to railroads in the Eastern US like trains with EMP containers (Domestic interline container service offered by Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern) or trains with UMAX containers (Domestic interline container service offered by Union Pacific and CSX), could TTX or BRAN be appropriate for any railroad?

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 
Originally Posted by Mike DeBerg:
Originally Posted by jgtrh62:
 I have a feeling these cars are going to sell better than anticipated.

Agreed, I have no doubt that these cars will sell better and we'll see several runs, especially containers, within a short time period, as with the Trinity 5161's

 

Most of what Rob stated in the interview has already been shared in the forum or in the flyer.

 

A couple points I picked up on watching the interview

 

  • Formal Announcement very soon (This month)
  • Ordering through end of October (covers the York show)
  • Planned Delivery Q1 or Q2 of 2016
  • Several modeler installed options (included with cars) for operating cars on tighter radius curves 
  • Containers will have a couple variations, ribs, door configuration, etc.
Last edited by Mike DeBerg
Originally Posted by Mike DeBerg:
...

I'm hearing just in the guys I'm talking with near 53 sets of cars and I lost count of containers.

 

Interesting...  As I indicated earlier, I may spring for a set or two just for variety.  But I'm a bit puzzled by those folks saying they're enamored with this version of an intermodal car compared to the Gundersons Atlas-O did nearly 10 years ago.  I actually like those better!  So I can certainly understand why Atlas-O may be a bit cautious about how well this car will do.

 

David

David,
 
Fairly simple.  These are a more typical car you see today hauling domestic goods around the country. 
 
Nothing against the twin-stacks, just don't see many of those sets anymore.  As mentioned Atlas could take those cars and cut them down to make the maxi-I's which are widely used today on railroads.
 
Originally Posted by Rocky Mountaineer:
Interesting...  As I indicated earlier, I may spring for a set or two just for variety.  But I'm a bit puzzled by those folks saying they're enamored with this version of an intermodal car compared to the Gundersons Atlas-O did nearly 10 years ago.  I actually like those better!  So I can certainly understand why Atlas-O may be a bit cautious about how well this car will do.

 

Don,  Certainly wouldn't disagree.  Seems likely we could see ET44 since they would reuse a lot of the same components from previous releases, and multiple manufacturers have produced AC44's, ES44's, etc...

 

Although not super modern, personally I would like to see an SD40-2, GP40-2, SD40T-2 and SW1500.

 

I'd prefer to get several new freight car releases (modern reefer, centerbeam flat, oil tank cars, spine cars), some D-style signals, and modern buildings

Again, I would most like to see an SD40-2.  A GP38/40-2 would awesome as well.  SD70(Mac) and variants would be great too. 

Spine cars would be cool - I agree with you on that one Mike!

I was really hoping atlas would announce their cars and containers officially today.   I guess we have an hour yet but not looking likely.   Bummer. 

Don

They will probably not make any announcement until after Sept 9 deadline for present model reservations. As far as pricing bear in mind that if Atlas was introducing a stand alone well car Gunderson AP53 it would be at least the list price [119.95] of the latest repaint/rerun 89' intermodal flat car [diecast] which 2 years ago was cancelled for lack of reservations at 109.95.Not that the MAXI-IV will  not get sufficient reservations Just looking at potential pricing.JMO

Hi Naveen,

 

Sure and I'm sure others will chime as well.

 

One of the most popular railroads for BRAN/Pacer is UP.   TTX I've seen on just about on all Class I railroads.  FEC I've seen on NS and BNSF.   Sure they can be seen on UP and CSX and well.

 

Originally Posted by naveenrajan:

Mike,

I share your excitement for these Maxi-Stack cars. Would you or someone else on this thread know which road names are appropriate for specific railroads? It is obvious for BNSF & Florida East Coast but which railroads use TTX & BRAN? I remember seeing both TTX & Pacer intermodal cars on my road trips but I don’t remember which railroads were hauling them. Also since intermodal trains from railroads in the western US are passed on to railroads in the Eastern US like trains with EMP containers (Domestic interline container service offered by Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern) or trains with UMAX containers (Domestic interline container service offered by Union Pacific and CSX), could TTX or BRAN be appropriate for any railroad?

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 

 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×