Skip to main content

I picked mine up in person at my LHS Saturday morning. It was boxed within a pristine Lionel shipping carton and, inside that, within a hermetically sealed, heavy-duty plastic bag that also appeared untouched/factory sealed. However, once I cut open the bag I found all three of the round, clear plastic tapes that seal the product box had already been sliced open. When I examined the components, all seemed well although the remote had a couple of light scratches and the three contact strips on the underside definitely evidenced at least some minimal amount of cradle time in a base.

 

I haven't tried it out yet, and probably won't go through the hassle of an explanation/exchange/return if it functions correctly, but I have to ask--has anyone else had a similar experience with their "new" unit? Like others, I have been waiting a long time for this thing and was excited to pick it up, but found this to be a little disconcerting and a bit of a disappointment.

Last edited by Tuscan Jim
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Roman:

I never understand the conspiracy theories that dominate the board at times.

 

I never took a long hard look at things when I received mine long ago, I wanted to play with it. I suggest you do the same. Plug it in and have fun. Now if it was scratches on the plastic of the remote, or base where someone tried to pry it open, that would be an isuue.

 

Should there be problem , Lionel will take of it. Mine was received back last week after about a week in their servcice and it works great. I've had mine since the first release (2008?) and it's worked perfectly until a comm port issue.

 

 

 

 

 

Last edited by Roman

The problem is that they should tell the customer.  Put a little white piece of paper saying to the effect that "[t]o ensure quality control, your unit was selected by Lionel to make sure it operates appropriately.  This is why you might see slight signs of use."  That being said, the others are most likely correct, but it would be good to confirm

 

Heck, I would like to see more stuff tested before shipping.  I have made a point of having any new trains tested before leaving the store.  I don't want to get it home to find out something is not right.  I find this is much more necessary than it was when I was a kid -- DOA units or other problems were simply not an issue in our experience.  Of course the trains were much simpler but given the complexity today, it's a good precaution in my view.

Originally Posted by RAL:

The problem is that they should tell the customer.  Put a little white piece of paper saying to the effect that "[t]o ensure quality control, your unit was selected by Lionel to make sure it operates appropriately.  This is why you might see slight signs of use."  That being said, the others are most likely correct, but it would be good to confirm

To add to Chris's statement above. They did, Mike Reagan stated months ago that the remotes were "sent back" because of a component issue.

 

They all had to be repaired/upgraded to fix the issue, that cannot be done without opening the box.

 

I think we may be picking "nits" here.

Last edited by RickO
Originally Posted by Roman:
Originally Posted by Roman:

I never understand the conspiracy theories that dominate the board at times.

 

I never took a long hard look at things when I received mine long ago, I wanted to play with it. I suggest you do the same. Plug it in and have fun. Now if it was scratches on the plastic of the remote, or base where someone tried to pry it open, that would be an isuue.

 

Should there be problem , Lionel will take of it. Mine was received back last week after about a week in their servcice and it works great. I've had mine since the first release (2008?) and it's worked perfectly until a comm port issue.

 

 

 

 

 

Hey...mine just suffered a comm port issue. Must be a systemic

Originally Posted by RickO:
Originally Posted by RAL:

The problem is that they should tell the customer.  Put a little white piece of paper saying to the effect that "[t]o ensure quality control, your unit was selected by Lionel to make sure it operates appropriately.  This is why you might see slight signs of use."  That being said, the others are most likely correct, but it would be good to confirm

To add to Chris's statement above. They did, Mike Reagan stated months ago that the remotes were "sent back" because of a component issue.

 

They all had to be repaired/upgraded to fix the issue, that cannot be done without opening the box.

 

I think we may be picking "nits" here.

Although I agree with the bigger point, I am not picking nits.  You have no idea the person who opened the box.  We can engage in informed speculation but we don't really know.  It goes back to whether you want to make sure the customer is happy on a high dollar discretionary purchase, or whether you would risk having that person be less than fully pleased.  Personally, I wouldn't really care as long as the item worked, but at the same time the person above is a consumer who spent money on a high dollar discretionary product.  If  you were in charge at Lionel, would you rather make sure that this person is happy, or take the chance that they were less than happy, and came here to post about it?  It's a question of how detailed you want to be in running your business.  Not every O gauge consumer reads this forum is or up to date on the latest bit of information from Mike Reagan at Lionel.  So it comes down to whether in a space where you are selling high dollar discretionary items, you believe that it is critical that the customer be happy.  My view is that it is.

Last edited by RAL
 
Originally Posted by RAL:

You have no idea the person who opened the box.  We can engage in informed speculation but we don't really know. 

sure we do.  on another thread Charlie Nassau posted pictures of his pallets of 990's someone enlarged the picture and some of the dates were feb and march of this year.  you can bet that lionel did not just sit on those for 5 months.  and I would not believe lionel sent them back to china they were opened and fixed here.

Last edited by bigdodgetrain

I think the bigger answer is that Lionel train items generally have no "sealed" quality expectation. I have gotten new items from various dealers that have been opened but with no obvious degradation having been opened. I would guess some things have been displayed, etc. Maybe even took a loop around the track once or twice. My local store has many items in the glass case that have to be repackaged when you purchase them. I have gotten "sealed" items fresh from China with windows fallen out, hoses broken off, smoke motors screeching, coil couplers with pinched wires. It seems to me that if anybody doesn't want to open a box, it would be the dealers. If they had to fix all this stuff after they tested it they wouldn't ever get any profitable work done.  So I just don't get the "it has been slightly used" issue with these kinds of hobby items. Even cameras on the shelf when we had camera stores. How about new cars on the lot? Jeeze Louise...

On a similar note, I have a friend who used to open the box of something in a store to inspect it, and then take a fresh unopened box off the bottom of the stack for his own use. My comment to him was that he inspected carefully the item, and then took a completely unknown to purchase. Dumb.

Originally Posted by bigdodgetrain:
Originally Posted by RAL:
Originally Posted by RickO:
Originally Posted by RAL:

You have no idea the person who opened the box.  We can engage in informed speculation but we don't really know. 

sure we do.  on another thread Charlie Nassau posted pictures of his pallets of 990's someone enlarged the picture and some of the dates were feb and march of this year.  you can bet that lionel did not just sit on those for 5 months.  and I would not believe lionel sent them back to china they were opened and fixed here.

My shipping carton has 01-14-14 date. #990 box has code 00714 EL.

Originally Posted by C W Burfle:

IMHO, Jim's question was perfectly reasonable, as was his comments that a notice placed inside the box would have been nice.

How many of us would be happy to receive a new television in similar condition?

you except lionel to put a note in hundreds if not thousands of 990 sets?

 

they would spend more time putting in notes then fixing the issue.

My level of concern would depend on how truly "light" the scratches are. 

 

The tape on the box flaps I could chalk up to the situation.  It would not be prudent to expect Lionel to reproduce the boxes (at great expense) just to produce "sealed" units in this case. (though others may feel differently)  Fresh tape over the previously cut tape is not really any better than just tape that is obviously cut, IMO.

 

Back to the scratches.  If I take an item apart in my basement to fix it, scratches are a risk I am subjecting myself to because I am doing the work.

 

If I buy something "new" from the company that makes it, I fully expect their manufacturing processes and technicians to be competent enough to not mar the product if they need to re-work the unit prior to delivery to correct something like the poor quality chip that seems to have caused the delay in shipment.

 

-Dave

Last edited by Dave45681
Originally Posted by bigdodgetrain:
Originally Posted by C W Burfle:

IMHO, Jim's question was perfectly reasonable, as was his comments that a notice placed inside the box would have been nice.

How many of us would be happy to receive a new television in similar condition?

you except lionel to put a note in hundreds if not thousands of 990 sets?

 

they would spend more time putting in notes then fixing the issue.

I don't believe anyone is talking hand-written notes here.

 

A fraction of a piece of paper placed in each box with a (mas produced - computers and/or photo copiers are wonderful devices) 2 sentence explanation would add no time to the process.  (certainly no time when compared to actually replacing hardware within the unit)

 

-Dave

Im with david, quit whining about the factory scratches and get to work putting your own scratches on it. You can complain all you want but the fact of the matter is if you want to have a legacy system you have to accept the fact that the cherry has been pooped on your box. Be thankful they checked them all out so you dont have to send them back

Originally Posted by Dave45681:
Originally Posted by bigdodgetrain:
Originally Posted by C W Burfle:

IMHO, Jim's question was perfectly reasonable, as was his comments that a notice placed inside the box would have been nice.

How many of us would be happy to receive a new television in similar condition?

you except lionel to put a note in hundreds if not thousands of 990 sets?

 

they would spend more time putting in notes then fixing the issue.

I don't believe anyone is talking hand-written notes here.

 

A fraction of a piece of paper placed in each box with a (mas produced - computers and/or photo copiers are wonderful devices) 2 sentence explanation would add no time to the process.  (certainly no time when compared to actually replacing hardware within the unit)

 

-Dave

Does anybody read those things anyway? We don't even read the manuals, we come here for answers to all our problems!  

They should of charged more for these items because they have been tested. Thanks to Mike Reagan these units are perfect. Some people call and complain that there is marks on the wheels of an engine that is new, they think its used and I tell them they are tested at the factory and they do not believe me. These same people think I used the engine before shipping it to them.

Pat

I worked one summer at a car dealership. You would be surprised how much work we did on a new car before it was offered for sale. Everything from adding a mirror to adding AC. We even swapped radios and did do a factory directed service ( ie recalls) And no one ever posted a note in the car since we did the work before it was offered for sale. Same with these units

Now had they gone to dealers and failed and were returned to be repaired  then I would expect them to be marked as "Refurbished" but the fact is these were never offered for sale and never left Lionel's control. They are new

How do you feel about MTHs claim they test and adjust as need every premier engine before shipping, does that make them not new?

Last edited by cbojanower
I received a 990 last week. The remote was in a distressed condition. It had scratches  and some type of dirt on it. i sent it back and asked for one that appeared new.
I am surprised by the number of posters who disparages anyone who pays for something new and conplains if the product they get is a scratch and dent.

Perhaps Lionel really tripped on this product rollout.  Delayed for months, then repaired in a less than professional manner, at least judging from the unit I got. Some seem eager to give a pass on this. 

Lionel should discount this product, they have done a poor job bringing it to market.

Fred

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×