Skip to main content

I have been in Manufacturing for over 45 years and I have seen our jobs go first to Mexico and now China. Every time I pay $69.99 list for a plastic box car that says made in China, it makes me wonder how much more would I pay for the same train made in the U S A? I know 40% more has be said, but knowing what I know I have my doubts that it is that high! So would you pay more for trains being made in the USA? and if yes how much more?

Rich in NH

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by maint:

I have been in Manufacturing for over 45 years and I have seen our jobs go first to Mexico and now China. Every time I pay $69.99 list for a plastic box car that says made in China, it makes me wonder how much more would I pay for the same train made in the U S A? I know 40% more has be said, but knowing what I know I have my doubts that it is that high! So would you pay more for trains being made in the USA? and if yes how much more?

Rich in NH

You would pay the same. But the profit margin for the manufactures would be way less.

The import computers and TV's work and may be cheaper, the import automobiles work, not necessarily cheaper, and not without recalls, either, but the choices and

variety are, not good, but better.   Import electronics in trains....works not so well, but why under our govt. and corporate bureaucracy here would trains be even affordable? Most were chased overseas because they were not affordable if made here.  And they'd HAVE to be better.  IF made here, the choices would be greater due to less turn-around time and better understanding of the market...elimination of pre-ordering and glacial delivery?

....maybe not, although turning something out "fustest with the mostest" would have

a competitive advantage.  This last does not now seem to be a market concern.

There are multiple posts on this forum that ask where can I get this or that item for the cheapest price.   People may say that they would be willing to pay more for a comparable item made in the USA.  When it comes to making a purchase decision, however, they seldom do it.

 

A classic example is airline fares.  People select an airline that is $10 dollars cheaper on a $300 + ticket even when the  airline with the higher priced ticket may have a more direct flight, better leg room, free bags, etc.  Lowest cost on comparable products seems to be all that matters.  

 

Joe    

 

 

TOTALLY AGREE
 
ALSO THE SECONDARY MARKET IS COMPETING WITH NEW PRODUCT. 
 
STEVE
Originally Posted by AG:

Hi

the question is not how much we want to pay, the question is how much will cost you to produce it here. If the production price is reasonable maybe we dont need to pay more for the same product.

Andre.

 

When the Lionel collector market began to fall apart over a decade ago, it spelled the beginning of the end for folks who put a premium on trains made in America by Lionel.

Today,  the hobby has become so repetitive and innundated with similar product, companies are now turning to gimmics to make the sale.  

The consumer dollar in this hobby now goes to whomever can deliver the next gimmic cheap enough to make something really old appear exciting all over again.

In this hobby, it's all about cost...period. 

Joe

 

Last edited by JC642
Originally Posted by J Daddy:
....

You would pay the same. But the profit margin for the manufactures would be way less.

DING.... DING.... DING.... DING.... DING...  Give that man a prize!!! 

 

Make no mistake about it folks... moving manufacturing overseas (all industries -- not just toy trains which is insignificant in the "big picture") has ALWAYS been about finding the lowest cost producer so that profits and executive level compensation could be maximized.  That has become the American way in Corporate America.  It was seldom -- if ever -- about generating lower consumer prices, and anyone who actually believes otherwise has swallowed the kool-aid...  hook, line, and sinker.   

 

Now having said that... if by some small miracle, production would return back to the USA (highly unlikely in my lifetime), companies would undoubtedly try to push prices upward so as not to lose the gravy-train profit margins that were first achieved by using overseas suppliers.  Consumers would most likely push back, resulting in a glut of inventory -- which, by the way, we're pretty close to seeing anyway these days... between new products just arriving from overseas plus pre-owned product on the secondary market.  It's the double-edged sword of having it all right now.

 

David

Last edited by Rocky Mountaineer
Originally Posted by rattler21:

...

This isn't about the price of a flat car.

...

Of course not.  In the grand scheme of things, our toy train market is insignificant compared to the "big picture".  But scaled down, the business model (and all its benefits) works the same.  The real trick is how products are marketed... with the most successful companies convincing consumers that it's OK to spend MORE on something (i.e., think Nike, for example) even though the cost of manufacturing overseas is a fraction of what it would be if the product were made here in the USA.

 

David

Last edited by Rocky Mountaineer
Originally Posted by t8afao:

Yes, but Weaver are made here and their prices are comparable as with the detail.  Nick 

 

 

Approx. 70% of Weaver's products are made in the US, not all of it.  And those that are are consist predominantly of their plastic-bodied diesels and freight cars.   The die-cast trucks on the freight cars are made & imported by MTH.  And as to the bulk of those Weaver USA-made cars & diesels being comparable to the detailing on the majority of scale items from Atlas O, MTH, & Lionel within the last decade or so, well, let's just call that debatable.

 

 

Originally Posted by JDaddy:

You would pay the same.  But the profit margin from the manufacturers would be way less.

To expect that the manufacturers would be willing to sacrifice profit margins by making the average price of domestically made products the same as their imported offerings is completely unrealistic.  So I would disagree that one would "pay the same" as they do now across the board.

 

A lot of people always like to hold their heads up high, chest puffed out and proclaim that they would pay "a little bit more" but that begs the question, how do they define "a little bit more"?  I suspect most think "a little bit more" would be along the lines of around $10 more for freight cars and maybe $50 more for engines.  Well, if MTH's claim on their Facebook page of a potential 30% increase holds any merit (which I think it does) then these same "willing to pay more" crowd may sing a slightly different tune. 

 

Oh, I'm certain some of them will stick to their guns and continue to buy with that increase in price, but I suspect that the quantity of new train purchases they make now will actually decrease in relation to that.  Most definitely will cause a decrease in consumer spending on average to be sure, and that's something that won't bode well for the importers/manufactures.  They get enough hollering on how much the prices on their products are as it is; to invest in moving everything back to the States en masse and slap a 30% increase in pricing to make up for the extra overhead would be entrepreneurial suicide.

Quality and ease of repair trump cost regardless of who makes what. USA goods don't necessarily stand up to that criteria. They used to. I just read where the US has to relearn the basics of manufacturing that was lost in the zeal to move everything overseas.Buy USA programs such as Walmart are struggling to find manufacturers to make basic stuff here.

Originally Posted by electroliner:

Quality and ease of repair trump cost regardless of who makes what. USA goods don't necessarily stand up to that criteria. They used to. I just read where the US has to relearn the basics of manufacturing that was lost in the zeal to move everything overseas.Buy USA programs such as Walmart are struggling to find manufacturers to make basic stuff here.

Yup. Fully agree with you on that. You would have to prove to me that it would be worth the extra money. Made in the USA and quality don't go together like they used to. I think problems with overseas made trains have more to do with logistics than quality control. I don't know if it's true, but someone once told me that US firms don't or didn't want to be bothered with the small precision level castings needed to do steam engines for example.

But to answer the original question if the quality was better I would gladly pay an additional 10% or so. Maybe a little more if tech support improved to go with it.

Nope, not a chance. 

 

This country has been pushing for more tolerance, more diversity, more global perspective and embrace.  We apparently don't want to be exceptional.  Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

 

So, now that our manufacturing choices are global, and we've helped totalitarian regimes taste the fruits of capitalism that was once our domain, you want me to be a hypocrite and say, 'Gosh, I had no idea how painful this global kumbaya could be to my wallet and well-being!  I think its time to return to the good ol' days that my parents tell me that their parents told them once existed around here!'?

 

And every time you open the packaging for your new made-in-China veeblefetzer  and sort through the instructions provided in any one of 7 or more global languages, remind yourself of how wonderful this global altruism really is.  We've made so many other people in the world so happy for the jobs we've given them, the least we can do is say 'Why, you're welcome!  It's the least we could do for you!'.

 

Oh, and to the chap who claims all of this is for the benefit of a greedy company/corporate executive?....   How convenient to not mention the global-leading menu of financial homage American businesses pay to the far-sighted government(s) WE elected to lead us into this global kumbaya.  Profit=Greed?  Yeah, right.  How's YOUR Kool-Aid tasting?

 

Admit this all a mistake?  Never!  WE made this...WE live with it.  

 

Oh, and kids!?......I'm sorry for the mess WE've left you.

 

Pogo was right.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Last edited by dkdkrd

Round-a-bout way of answering the question, but let's forget about fair trade in favor of equal trade. For every dollar we import, the trading partner would have to accept our exports in the same amount. We are so out of touch that we are allowing those who export to us and are making huge bucks off of us to dominate our economy.

 

If the trading partner fails to meet the "equal" standard, we should tax the dickens out of the surplus to provide jobs and new technologies and use the tariff income to promote our economy.

 

It is not just model trains that are effected, it is the future of our country and if we allow this to continue, the future is pretty scary.

 

It is indeed sad to have to use this thread as a soapbox, but it is about time we woke up. The cost of the trains we buy and just about everything else we purchase from imports would take care of itself if we as a country get smart.

To make a sweeping statement and expect that all of the various products used by model railroaders could simply have their manufacturing transferred here is unrealistic.  Different countries have different specialties.  Here in the United States, we CAN do some production on a competitive basis.  Injection molding might be one of them, and there are a number of plastic products that are made here such as Weaver's plastic car and engine shells.  OGR's Ameritown buildings and Korber buildings are also made here.  But things like microelectronics are way beyond our capability in mass manufacturing. 

 

So, yes I would encourage our manufacturers to produce what they can on these shores, and I would support that by choosing USA made items.  To a limited degree I would pay more for such products, perhaps as much as 50% more.  But the decision that I make when I buy RR products is whether I want or need a particular item, not where it was made.

 

Automobiles, real ones, are a different matter.  Here I can choose which car I buy and I will always choose to buy an American car.

 

Paul Fischer

Only if they made what I want (and that would be..."correct" for Seaboard Air Line).

 

I expect many of us on this forum have way too many engines and rolling stock as it is.  A new company that would start fresh here in the US and expect to sell at a higher price while the overseas items are still being pumped out would be crazy as there's an overflow now.

 

If the current makers stopped production overseas and brought it back to the US and folks still wanted trains...then we'd have no choice but to pay more.  Maybe Lionel, MTH, Atlas, Weaver, and 3rd Rail/GGD can convince congress to help them by placing a heavy import fee on model trains from overseas.

 

I watched a show the other night that showed a group in South Carolina that had renewed an "apprenticeship" program, training people how to "make" things.  What a concept (I've been thru 2 apprenticeships in my life, what happened to this country to make companies stop training people?).  From what they were saying it is a huge success, there's a lot of people in this country who don't mind working with their hands (according to the program).  These folks (young and not so young) were making $10 or more/hour and getting paid while going to school.

 

Lionel is now nearby in NC, maybe they ought to make a step towards training people here to "make" things again.

Originally Posted by Rocky Mountaineer:
 
The real trick is how products are marketed... with the most successful companies convincing consumers that it's OK to spend MORE on something (i.e., think Nike, for example) even though the cost of manufacturing overseas is a fraction of what it would be if the product were made here in the USA.
 
I agree with what you are saying, but Nike might be a bad example, pay more (sure), but I've bought about 15 pairs in the last 10 years. Made in Vietnam, China, and Indonesia. Manufactured here, same quality or better, profit margins the same to Nike, a $100.00 pair would probably be about $150 to 160.  If forced to manufacture in US the likely result would be a price increase and a quality decrease. So Nike could keep that profit margin as close to the same as present. They would be afraid to raise the price too much, and with manufacturing costs higher, gov. regs., wages, etc., the only place left to cut would be on the product itself.
 
I would like to see more made in the US. I'd pay more, if the quality was better. But the catch 22 is, I cant buy as many different things. It won't bother me that much, but someone  else need me to buy their product too. And made in USA, means just that, every nut, bolt, screw, washer, diode made here. Raw materials manufactured here. Now rethink that cost. That $300 engine, with PS3 will now have a price tag probably over $900. But that's what "Made in USA" should mean. There is assembled in USA, but I believe some of the product, nuts, bolts, electronic parts, whatever can be mfg elsewhere if the majority is built here. Which brings up another point, Assembled in USA, Built in USA, and Manufactured in USA.
 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×