Originally Posted by Rocky Mountaineer:
The real trick is how products are marketed... with the most successful companies convincing consumers that it's OK to spend MORE on something (i.e., think Nike, for example) even though the cost of manufacturing overseas is a fraction of what it would be if the product were made here in the USA.
I agree with what you are saying, but Nike might be a bad example, pay more (sure), but I've bought about 15 pairs in the last 10 years. Made in Vietnam, China, and Indonesia. Manufactured here, same quality or better, profit margins the same to Nike, a $100.00 pair would probably be about $150 to 160. If forced to manufacture in US the likely result would be a price increase and a quality decrease. So Nike could keep that profit margin as close to the same as present. They would be afraid to raise the price too much, and with manufacturing costs higher, gov. regs., wages, etc., the only place left to cut would be on the product itself.
I would like to see more made in the US. I'd pay more, if the quality was better. But the catch 22 is, I cant buy as many different things. It won't bother me that much, but someone else need me to buy their product too. And made in USA, means just that, every nut, bolt, screw, washer, diode made here. Raw materials manufactured here. Now rethink that cost. That $300 engine, with PS3 will now have a price tag probably over $900. But that's what "Made in USA" should mean. There is assembled in USA, but I believe some of the product, nuts, bolts, electronic parts, whatever can be mfg elsewhere if the majority is built here. Which brings up another point, Assembled in USA, Built in USA, and Manufactured in USA.