Skip to main content

Is it me or are we seeing more and more issues with engines and rolling stock not able to negotiate curves from 054 and smaller now?

seeing we want to have a more prototypical box car a more scale sized locomotive have we managed to create this issue ourselves? 

Or is the current makers actually making these items deviating from what most rolling stock would navigate the small 027 gauge track or 031 track not realizing the issues some are having running the newer cars and locomotives?

 

Anyone have any thoughts on this you care to share?

 

$oo

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

A tight curve on a modern prototype railroad scales out to O-240 (yeah, that's 24 feet on diameter).if you have space limitations you can switch to a different scale, switch to selectively compressed models, switch to modeling pre WW-2 era trains, switch to modeling specialty settings were short equipment is prototypical.

Originally Posted by chuck:

A tight curve on a modern prototype railroad scales out to O-240 (yeah, that's 24 feet on diameter)....

it's actually a little better than that.  O240 (which is 20' diameter) equates to a 12° curve.  the tightest siding curves were on the order of 20° or in 1:48 scale, O146 (even a Big Boy could negotiate a 20° curve), but the sharpest Class I Railroad mainline curve used to and still may be 6° (which would be O480 or 20' radius).

Well, I could barely do those class 1 curves in N scale in my trainroom.  The largest diameter I can fit is about 12 feet.  I have noticed a lot of O-54 stuff lately but I have two loops that run that, so I'm okay with it: longer/bigger cars are, I think, part of the push for scale stuff and modern stuff.  I'm part of that trend so I can't complain.

Originally Posted by Lee Willis:

Well, I could barely do those class 1 curves in N scale in my trainroom.  The largest diameter I can fit is about 12 feet.  ...

though not as severe as 3-rail O, most model railroads push curve limits.  a 40" radius in HO is usually considered generous, but is still a 20° curve.  even with outdoor live steam railroads, many 7.5" gauge (1.5" scale) tracks use a 40' minimum radius which as large as it looks is also just about 18°.

Along with larger rolling stock, you may also need a larger engine to go thru the curves without derailing. Atlas 21 inch Amtrak passenger cars will need an SD-40 or U33C diesel engine because these have three axles per truck, even on 042 Gargraves curves.

You don't want to forget about knuckle coupler end-play with Lionel style couplers.

 

Lee Fritz

Just ran into this problem, as a matter of fact.  Recently I started saving my pennies for the lovely Polar Railroad Conventional 4-6-2 K-4.  I'm generally opposed to paying more than a few hundred dollars for a locomotive, but I find that thing intoxicating.  As I was ogling it on Lionel.com, I was dismayed to see a minimum O54 curve; everything on my layout is O36.  Very bummed!

 

As products become more and more prototypical, I'd imagine backwards compatability to O27, O31, and O36 will decrease.

Originally Posted by overlandflyer:
... but the sharpest Class I Railroad mainline curve used to and still may be 6° (which would be O480 or 20' radius).

10° minimum curves are a typical standard for some mainline railroads through mountainous terrain, such as the Cascade Route in Oregon. With numerous 10° curves and lengthy 1.8% grades, the speed limit is generally 20-25MPH. Cantara Loop in Northern California is a 14° curve, which is sharper than usual for a mainline railroad. A well-engineered logging or branchline railroad might have 16° minimum curves.

 

Our typical curves for 3-rail O-gauge are proportionately sharper than what is generally used for scale equipment in HO.

I'm lucky in my new space where I'm building a layout.   I have 1 curve that is O-81 and the rest is O-100 and larger.   I'm using all Atlas flex track with graduated curves.

 

Oddly, I've become picky about the "gap" between the steam engine and tender and I've been shorting draw-bars by a lot.   I have a feeling many of my steamers won't make O-72 any more.

Gentlemen,

   Russell is right on the money, if you want to run 027 type trains you are going to need to look at the starter sets, you can not expect to run scale 0 Guage trains on this kind of starter track.  Remember also if you run the O Guage larger rolling stock

you must have the large radious switches to accommodate the rolling stock, 022 type Lionel switches will not get the job done for these type of trains.  Even the original O guage Tin Plate really needs the 072 type switches with 048 curves to run without problems. 

PCRR/Dave

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×