Skip to main content

><><><

Hello Fellas,

Here is my situation, I'm  planning on installing (10) DZ-2500 switch machines.

I'm running TMCC, Gargraves flex track, and Gargraves & Ross switches. I have one ASC 3000. I know I'll need more ASC's (new or old????)

What type and size of wire should be used? [furthest sw. is less than 10 feet away from the ASC]

What voltage is required for the DZ-2500?

What means of wire connections do you use? [wire nuts, stake-on's, wago's, solder......]

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 20250219_092519
Last edited by ZAK
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The manual https://www.zstuffexpress.com/...bd0dd69ef5e97f61.pdf

You could use 22-24 gauge wire without concern. These are not drawing Amps of current.

That said, having used both types- I actually would recommend DZ-1000 VS 2500s given my experience with them.

The DZ-2500 is intentionally a slower switching machine. This might look more "scale" and I can understand why someone might think they want it- but the how it achieves that low speed is by the electronics tickling the tiny motor with pulses of current. This means that any extra friction or load- the switch motor may fail to move. In other words, they are relatively weak- and no increasing source voltage is NOT a fix. They use regulator internally and all you are doing by raising source voltage is more heat in that regulator.

If you connect up and desire the anti-derailing function- again these are slower switch motors and while the anti-derailing function is faster- it's not the same as instant and given where your sensing is and speed of the wheels- probably won't be effective at switching before derailment happens.

You are not even using the built in wired TMCC control function- you are using ASCs- so again not even using a built in function.

I am not trying in any way to bash the DZ-2500. Obviously it is designed for a purpose and has a lot of features. That said, experience and real world usage on multiple layouts- I found that now I much prefer the snap fast and strong operation of the DZ-1000.

As with any internet advice YMMV.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
Last edited by Vernon Barry

Bash away Vernon!   I use the DZ-2500's, and if I had it to do again, I'd go for the Tortoise switch machines!  I'm not at all happy with the reliability of the DZ-2500's.

On one point I'll disagree.  The non-derailing is more than fast enough to switch before a train comes through, I've run stuff around at 90 scale MPH and the non-derailing is always fast enough.  The problem with the non-derailing is a short sensing rail, sometimes the first set of wheels may not reliably trigger it.  For stuff on the mainline, I've added a short section of extra track for the non-derailing sensing to make sure the train gets detected.

Bash away Vernon!   I use the DZ-2500's, and if I had it to do again, I'd go for the Tortoise switch machines!  I'm not at all happy with the reliability of the DZ-2500's.

This makes me feel better that I decided to go with Tortoise for all the switches on the new layout. I miss the "instant" throw, but the reliability has been consistent.

><><><

Thanks for the replies!

It looks like I'm stuck with using the DZ-2500! I have at least 15 of them.

Did someone allude to the fact that these can be used 'directly' with TMCC instead of the ASC ?

I posted some pics of what I have to deal with. There is a CAB-2, TPC-3000, TPC-3000 platinum, and some other device by Lionel  Which has another device attached.  If I remember correctly (from another post of mine), it is some sort of data driver for the DZ's.

Attachments

Images (4)
  • 20250220_140956
  • 20250220_195322
  • 20250220_195332
  • 20250220_195335

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×