Skip to main content

 

less than 10 railroads had URSA type Pacific's. Why not just make those and move on? 

Image result for railroads that has a USRA type pacific

 

 

Actually, more USRA loco were built after the first allocations, as "copies" and later "based ons". This varied with type, but the USRA Light Pacific was a widespread basis. Also, the USRA-ness of a loco was not so much the surface appearance as it was the specs and dimensions

The beautiful USRA 2-6-6-2, popular with us modelers, was never copied, and only 30 were ever built.

Unfortunately, MTH in particular insists on calling its USRA 4-6-2 a "USRA Heavy Pacific", but it is actually more the Light Pacific above than the Heavy.

The old Samhongsa Williams brass USRA Pacific was pretty much a Heavy. Bigger boiler, different, lower domes. A huskier look.  

D500 posted:

Is the tooling based on the too-long B&O, Erie and Chicago & Alton Pacifics from the past? I think Lionel made a too-long PRR K-4 using this chassis, too, before switching to the K-Line tooling. The photos above do seem to show a loco that is too long in the firebox area for a Pacific. (I turned my TMCC "Erie" into a Hudson; waiting on re-lettering; makes a great freelance 4-6-4.)

 

Bingo! Every time I look at one of the new Pacific's the firebox gets longer. It's in dire need of a 2 axle truck lol.

 Having said that. I really hope those that ordered them enjoy them. 

Last edited by RickO

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×