Skip to main content

Scenario: TIU passive mode fixed 1 out to loop powered by a Z1000. Fixed 2 out to another loop powered by another Z1000. Note, neither of these loops share a common connection, they are completely separate.

I would like to power up the TIU (currently using Z750 aux in) and be able to toggle the loops individually to send out the watchdog >dark and silent >to my engines and MU's ready for a start command. An older quote from Barry i believe...but i don't think this was in passive mode. Thanks in advance.

To place any unpowered engine or lashup into DCS stealth mode without turning off and on power to a TIU channel, it's only necessary to the following:

  • Highlight the engine in the remote's Active or Inactive Engine list
  • Flip the siding's power switch
  • Immediately press the thumbwheel.
Last edited by willygee
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

willygee posted:

With the TIU on can i use a spst switch in line with one of the feeders from the Z1000 (basically applying track power) to issue the WD?

I don't see why you can't... The watch dog goes out each time the voltage on that channel  is raised above 0. So turn on the  channels  input feeder using a spst toggle and out goes the watch dog.  

It works just fine.

gunrunnerjohn posted:

Applying it to the outputs is fine, works for all four channels.

gunrunnerjohn, and all other electronic gurus here...

... in case this could be of interest to you ...

On the passive WD subject, I have started to develop a passive solution concept a while ago to take advantage of any passive WD sources for a period of 10 seconds.  It is an "On-Demand WD trigger". 

The first idea was to be able to use ONE single PBW (perpetual barking watchdog) to serve multiple tracks, as required. (ref: https://ogrforum.com/...89#70974704667412389 ). 

While doing the prototype, I then realized that this concept could be used with any passive WD source (ex: an unused TIU output !)

The passive (i.e, it does not need any separate power) circuit detects the transitions from 0Vac to 18Vac on a track, flips a relay for 10 seconds to power and connect momentarily the track to any passive WD sources, which in return immediately provide the WD signal to the newly powered track.  The process lasts 10 seconds, stops, and it is ready to be triggered again.

I unfortunately do not find enough time these days to fully complete this concept, but the prototypes I made proved it to be working/promising.  It is obviously an unfinished project at this moment, but a good starting point, in my opinion.

Attached is the relevant information on where I brought that project until now.  If someone wants to pursue the concept, please share your progress and successes !

Note 1 : I asked help for the circuit design on the electronics stackexchange.  The details are available at:  https://electronics.stackexcha...endent-power-sources

Note 2: The attached video shows the circuit connected to a PBW (perpetual barking watchdog).

Enjoy !

Attachments

Images (2)
  • fqjMD
  • WD-Dispatcher
Videos (1)
File 2017-06-20, 9 37 28 PM
Files (1)
Last edited by Daniel Auger
gunrunnerjohn posted:

Connecting two TIU channels together is not a good idea, so using a spare TIU channel may not be the best solution...

 

I fully agree that this does not seems to be the right thing to do with a TIU, but at the same time, when you think about it, that is exactly what happens each time locomotives or rolling stocks (with two pick-up rollers) pass over two isolated blocks powered by two separate TIU channels.  These locomotives or rolling stocks could also be stopped right there over an isolator, making a permanent connection between two TIU channels. 

I might be wrong, but as far as I know, there is no rule about where to stop a locomotive on a layout. 

My point here is not to start a debate.  It is just an observation that a connection between two TIU outputs  occurs most probably every 10 seconds on a busy layout, in passive mode or normal mode.

The prototype "On-Demand WD trigger" circuit proposed does that passive connection for 10 seconds, just the time to get the WD sent properly. 

That being said, and while I  did not have any problems during all test performed with any passive source of WD,  I would strongly recommend to use a standard DCS Remote Commander (http://mthtrains.com/50-1033) or a PBW (perpetual barking watchdog) in a passive mode as a WD source.  Nothing will get damaged for sure !

The "passive mode" has obviously some counter-intuitive advantages and mysteries ! 

Barry Broskowitz posted:

Daniel,

My point here is not to start a debate.

That's good, because there is no debate to be had

Intentionally bridging two TIU channels is simply a bad idea for a number of reasons. If they belong to 2 different TIUs, it's a worse idea.

Agreed Barry, but...  ...oupsss,... that's right,  "no debate",  that's what I wrote  ;-)  !

 

Add Reply

Post
The DCS Forum is sponsored by
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×