IMO the idea of an event such as York open to the public which doesn't provide access to all venues at the event is problematic. The public is eventaully going to ask why they are barred from entry to selected halls. Rationales stated so far are not compelling from a public point of view.
I've stayed out of this mess so far, but this comment (and a few others) moved me to chime in here... This really ain't rocket science, folks.
For years now, I've been attending a PhotoExpo show in the Jacob Javits Center in NYC. Crowds of people galore... In fact, it's an order of magnitude more than our little York train show.
I often pre-register so I can pick up my badge quickly when I arrive, but the general public can just as easily check in unregistered, pay an entrance fee, and get a badge for just the expo display (where a sea of vendor booths reside). The badge is labeled "EXPO ONLY".
Some folks attend the show for all 3 days (Thursday-Saturday), and can attend the expo vendor area as well as special break-out seminars. Badges indicate the access level to these different seminars or just the expo vendor area (and a few other events open to the general public who didn't pay to attend a break-out seminar).
My point is simple... We're not blazing a trail here. This type of thing has been done before in other industries -- some with WAY more attendees than what we're talking about at York.
At this point, I think it's fair to say that the EDTCA management will likely come up with a perfectly workable approach to admit John and Jane Q. Public on Friday and Saturday. So let's just see how it all works out. One thing is for certain. The York show will NEVER be all things to all people. Nor should the EDTCA attempt to make it so. It doesn't need to be a Greenberg show or WGH show. It only needs to be York. Folks who want to attend will attend, and those who don't won't. It's really that simple.
David