Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Forrest Jerome:

This from a NY Times article 

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05...tner=rss&emc=rss

 

Karl Edler, a retired engineer who drove the line hundreds of times, said an impact could help explain the wreck. When a train pulls out of the North Philadelphia station, the engineer usually twists the throttle “up to notch eight, which is engineer-speak for wide open” he said.

It is about three miles to the curve where Amtrak 188 derailed.

“Usually you just leave the throttle open until you get up to 80 miles per hour, then put on the brake for the curve,” he said. “Seems reasonable that something happened right about that time he would have started slowing down that kept him from taking the throttle off. He was startled by the impact or whatever. And by the time he realized it, it was too late.”

I totally agree, he was startled or spooked and lost his train of thought, he may have panicked and throw the throttle in the wrong direction and when he realized the curve was coming he through it into emergency stop. He is human and humans panic, all of them in one form or another.

That Nutter guy was way out of line.

Wow - That is a terrific article.  It was a tragic accident that shows how a moment of inattention, whatever the cause, can have terrible consequences.  I believe that I read somewhere that Amtrak now has positive train control on this section of track.

I don't understand why Amtrak would accelerate out of one curve only to break hard for the next one just a few seconds later.  I know it saves time but adding a minute to the schedule seems to be a safer bet. 

NH Joe

Eddie Marra posted:

I'm not quite getting why it's hoped the engineer would not be found negligent or reckless.  The train was accelerating going into that curve, was it not?  Isn't the engineer responsible for the control of the train he's assigned to?

It was going into a curve at about double the posted limit.  How is that not negligent or reckless?

Nothing will bring back the eight people killed, nothing will likely reduce the anguish & grief felt by both the families of those killed & the engineer. The engineer has lost a career that was a fulfillment of his lifelong dream & will likely be tormented with guilt for the rest of his life. Out of compassion & sympathy for the both the families & the engineer, I hope that the cause of the lack of situational awareness was largely out of the engineer's control, rather than due to inattentiveness, carelessness, or other form of negligence.

Eddie,

There is no question about the speed of the train at the time of the accident.   And certainly the engineer is responsible for control of the train.  

But as the article conveys, there is a very large unanswered question as to why it as going that fast.  Just 1 example possibility that comes to mind is - was the engineer knocked out or passed out at the time he should have reducing speed for the bend?

So even though the train was going 2 times the limit, and the engineer is always responsible for a locomotive's operations, there are at this time valid possibilities that were beyond the engineer's control for why he was not able to control the train. 

I really hope the authorities can clearly identify the cause, certainly for the families of those lost or injured but for the sake of the engineer, crew and their families as well.

Regardless of the outcome it will not change anything for all those involved.

Ed

 

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×